N1ggas still hatin on RG3?

[Master Teacher]

I'll keep this simple as possible since you seem to be learning NFL via Rosetta Stone

Luck throws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PASSES. AND THE MAJORITY OF HIS PASSES GO FARTHER DOWN THE FIELD. The laws of mathematics come into play and suggest that it is not surprising that if you make more difficult throws plus throw the ball a lot more than somebody else you just might have more INTS. Are you being serious?

Luck is ONE LESS GAME HAS OVER 100 MORE ATTEMPTS. 305 vs 411. One less game and Luck has thrown almost 3 more games worth of passes. He has more INTS

By that same logic HE SHOULD HAVE WAY MORE TD'S, the fact he has just as many TD's as he does INTS shows he's no where near as efficient as RG3 who has scored MORE TDS ON LESS ATTEMPTS

man you dumb as fukk, gotta be white a boy blinded by arrogance

 

[No1]

for sure, but the spread stuff the Patriots run came out of college. Quick screens to the WRs? That came from college too.


Its not 100% from there though, but this "college" and "gimmicky" stuff is just angry folks who are mad their defense cant stop it.

That's fair.

 

[A Friend of The People]

By that same logic HE SHOULD HAVE WAY MORE TD'S, the fact he has just as many TD's as he does INTS shows he's no where near as efficient as RG3 who has scored MORE TDS ON LESS ATTEMPTS

man you dumb as fukk, gotta be white a boy blinded by arrogance

Luck could throw 5 TD's against the Bills on Sunday and have just as many TD's as RG3. Since he's played 1 less game thats also a full 60 minutes less to throw touchdowns At that point the TD/INT ratio difference between the two becomes even less relevant than it is now

Luck also has about 1000 yards more passing yards in ONE LESS GAME. Adding to the stockpile of facts that he is a) asked to move the ball more b) actually does move the ball more 3) is asked to make longer and more difficult throws 4) is asked to run a more difficult system

How long will you try to ignore reality dipshyt. I do this all day and I don't say it unless facts back me up Now I promise on my unborn great niece you're outta here breh

 

[MikeBrownsJob]

By that same logic HE SHOULD HAVE WAY MORE TD'S, the fact he has just as many TD's as he does INTS shows he's no where near as efficient as RG3 who has scored MORE TDS ON LESS ATTEMPTS

man you dumb as fukk, gotta be white a boy blinded by arrogance

Dude straight ethered himself

And he has nowhere to go because that efficiency b/s he was spitting earlier was due to the fact that Luck had ran the ball less and scored the same amount of td's and first downs.

So which one is it?

 

[gho3st]

I'll keep this simple as possible since you seem to be learning NFL via Rosetta Stone

Luck throws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PASSES. AND THE MAJORITY OF HIS PASSES GO FARTHER DOWN THE FIELD. The laws of mathematics come into play and suggest that it is not surprising that if you make more difficult throws plus throw the ball a lot more than somebody else you just might have more INTS. Are you being serious?

Luck in ONE LESS GAME HAS OVER 100 MORE ATTEMPTS THAN RG3. 305 vs 411. One less game and Luck has thrown almost 3 more games worth of passes. He has more INTS

South Bend is Indiana right?

& Colts are also in Indy too right??


so

1 + 1 = 2

 

[Master Teacher]

Luck could throw 5 TD's against the Bills on Sunday and have just as many TD's as RG3. Since he's played 1 less game thats also a full 60 minutes less to throw touchdowns At that point the TD/INT ratio difference between the two becomes even less relevant than it is now

Luck also has about 1000 yards more passing yards in ONE LESS GAME. Adding to the stockpile of facts that he is a) asked to move the ball more b) actually does move the ball more 3) is asked to make longer and more difficult throws 4) is asked to run a more difficult system

How long will you try to ignore reality dipshyt. I do this all day and I don't say it unless facts back me up Now I promise on my unborn great niece you're outta here breh

I'm done talking to your dumb ass. Luck is far ahead of RGIII on passes thrown and has been less efficient, nothing is going to change that unless RGIII plays four terrible games in a row throwing ball 50 times.

I destroyed your argument man, RGIII passer rating is ridiculous man, Luck is a good quarterback but come on man RGIII is obviously more efficient.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

I'll keep this simple as possible since you seem to be learning NFL via Rosetta Stone

Luck throws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE PASSES. AND THE MAJORITY OF HIS PASSES GO FARTHER DOWN THE FIELD. The laws of mathematics come into play and suggest that it is not surprising that if you make more difficult throws plus throw the ball a lot more than somebody else you just might have more INTS. Are you being serious?

Luck in ONE LESS GAME HAS OVER 100 MORE ATTEMPTS THAN RG3. 305 vs 411. One less game and Luck has thrown almost 3 more games worth of passes. He has more INTS

U are makin excuses for Andrew Luck throwin picks. Cmon now. Where is his accountability? U act like the AFC south is a stronger division that the NFC east. Did u see some of the difficult throws that RG3 did in the past 2 weeks? Those 40,50,60 yd bombs in between 2 defenders? Are u sayin that RG3 is not accurate?

 

[A Friend of The People]

Dude straight ethered himself

And he has nowhere to go because that efficiency b/s he was spitting earlier was due to the fact that Luck had ran the ball less and scored the same amount of td's and first downs.

So which one is it?

Being the "more efficient passer" wouldn't make him the "better passing QB" just in the same way Luck clearly being the "more efficient runner" would not make him the "better running quarterback" which is why all I said was Luck was the more efficient runner

Nice try though however I'm not new at this

 

[MikeBrownsJob]

South Bend is Indiana right?

& Colts are also in Indy too right??


so

1 + 1 = 2

Just because of this dude I'm rooting for USC this weekend.

 

[Master Teacher]

Being the "more efficient passer" wouldn't make him the "better passing QB" just in the same way Luck clearly being the "more efficient runner" would not make him the "better running quarterback" which is why all I said way Luck was the more efficient runner

Nice try though however I'm not new at this

fukk running they play quarterback, if you have just as many TDS as you do INTS that IS NOT A GOOD THING UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE PERIOD.

RGIII is tougher mentally, and already has the respect of the league as a straight up menace. Luck is a good quarterback, but so are a lot of guys, he hasn't done anything spectacular other than beat up on a terrible jacksonville

 

[Kenny West]

South Bend is Indiana right?

& Colts are also in Indy too right??


so

1 + 1 = 2

Only a homer would be defending Luck against RG3 at this point anyway.

The fact that he pulled out the "WINZ" argument just made it obvious.

 

[A Friend of The People]

Only a homer would be defending Luck against RG3 at this point anyway.

The fact that he pulled out the "WINZ" argument just made it obvious.

only fans of loser teams refer to "winz" as some kind of argument

Either you win or you lose. Some do more of one than another

 

[Tony D'Amato]

Luck is so humble and chill, Im tired of u n1ggaz tryin to degrade him cuz Bob beating against overrated teams.

Luck had a Shootout wit Airon Rodjas and won

Bob's 2nd time around the division is gonna silence a lot of this. Book it

 

[Kenny West]

only fans of loser teams refer to "winz" as some kind of argument

Either you win or you lose. Some do more of one than another

Yall running out of Jaguars and Titans games on the schedule.

Get used to that feeling Brady gave yall last week

 

[mastermind]

Luck had a Shootout wit Airon Rodjas and won

RG3 had a shootout with Drew Breesus in his first ever professional game... and won. :smugstern: