Techniec
Drugs and Kalashnikovs
welcome to higher learning where most of the threads lack intellectuality and usually consist of Islamic hate.
I'm well acquainted with HLs deficiencies unfortunately
welcome to higher learning where most of the threads lack intellectuality and usually consist of Islamic hate.
yeah but they dont hear you though
They love this angle so I just let them run with it...trolls gonna troll
Yeah like your slave-trading cac verdean ancestors.
In 6th century Arabia, a girl was considered grown once she passed puberty, this at a time when the avg life expectancy was 40 something yrs old.
What the Prophet Mohamad did was nothing outside the nom of the time
Some here seem to be upset the Prophet Mohamad never let Aisha finish her freshmen year, and attend her jr high prom
This is true. This is also the case for the Greeks for example. Some of their philosophers and mathematicians, who's contributions to the entire world is unparalleled in my opinion, most likely had sex with young boys or teenage boys, as was customary of a lot of high society back then.
The issue with me though comes in terms of the theological claims behind the Prophet's life. If he was just a man, which is what I believe, we can certainly understand the context of life back then, even if we find it repugnant.
BUT
If you wish to believe he had communications directly or indirectly with God, it seems God would have told him how basic human anatomy works and the physical and psychological trauma a young girl would go through at that age when engaging in sexual acts with a fully grown man. It seems God might have explained to him through Gabriel the process of the development of a child. Surely, we can assume the creator of all things would be familiar with these concepts.
That's just how I view it though.
I just feel judging historical figures outside the context in which they emerged is rather simple and problematic
^ you're 100% correct and this is what I referred to earlier when I said this issue can be fashioned into a great critique.
As you can see, this is a much more lethal critique than "hey Mohamad was a pedophile"
Organized Atheism is actually older than Christianity and Islam. We have clear historical records of atheists in Asia (not Europe, notice) as early as 600 BC. So all this talk about atheism being a European, new age invention is not accurate.
Bring it forward.
There was a group of Indian philosophers who rejected the idea of gods, afterlife, souls, held that the natural elements were the only ingredients of all things, and that only direct sensory perception could be trusted as an approach to truth. They actively mocked people who believed in supernatural phenomenon and argued that priests and religious leaders were just businesspeople preying on the gullible. And they date back to earlier than 600 BC, but that is a safe date for establishing the period when they started writing.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cārvāka
Hindu Version of Materialism. Great School of Thought...
In 6th century Arabia, a girl was considered grown once she passed puberty, this at a time when the avg life expectancy was 40 something yrs old.
What the Prophet Mohamad did was nothing outside the nom of the time
Some here seem to be upset the Prophet Mohamad never let Aisha finish her freshmen year, and attend her jr high prom
That's your opinion. The point is that you were wrong when you said that atheism was a new age phenomenon invented by white people, when in fact it's much older than major religions like Christianity and Islam.
The info never said it was full blown atheism since it was under Hinduism which is a religion.
Sadly Materialism is worshiping shiny objects. Therefor you Atheism logic falls off the map when these men was to golds and other metals.