G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman
Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
And another one.
They would've said the same thing about the Christmas game if the refs called that foul on RJ at the end of the game and KD made those free throws.What are my Dubnation brehs feelings on people saying that the Cavs took the night off, or gave that game away..
I say bullshyt...no matter what their passive aggressive leader says, they hate us and we hate them..we are rivals. Nobody wants to lose to their rivals.
no.. disagree... xmas both team fought to the deat... last game.. cavs had no heart..They would've said the same thing about the Christmas game if the refs called that foul on RJ at the end of the game and KD made those free throws.
Everybody would've instead said how the refs are in the Warriors' pockets and how the Cavs were robbed, if RJ was called for a foul.no.. disagree... xmas both team fought to the deat... last game.. cavs had no heart..
but they aint gave the game away..the hole was too big for them to crawl out of so they didnt force it.
Everybody would've instead said how the refs are in the Warriors' pockets and how the Cavs were robbed, if RJ was called for a foul.
I went through the transcriptshumm kind of remember everyone saying it WAS a foul.. but i dont blame you... you werent logged on when it happened.
then you should know the talk was that it was a foul...and the NBA said it was a foulI went through the transcripts
Honestly, most of the talk was either centered around incidents that the Warriors allegedly got away with earlier in the game, making excuses by saying refs don't call that late in-games, how the Warriors benefit from calls in other games and the fans shouldn't complain, how the Warriors gave up a double-digit lead etc etc. It was amazing how almost everybody claimed Durant didn't get fouled at all on first viewing though.then you should know the talk was that it was a foul...and the NBA said it was a foul
you just said a bunch of nothing.. if they said warriors also got away with fouls.. then they are saying it was a foul.. if they said refs often dont call late game fouls (which is very true).. then that means they think it was a foul..and if the fould was called on RJ.. he would have been crucified for fouling..Honestly, most of the talk was either centered around incidents that the Warriors allegedly got away with earlier in the game, making excuses by saying refs don't call that late in-games, how the Warriors benefit from calls in other games and the fans shouldn't complain, how the Warriors gave up a double-digit lead etc etc. It was amazing how almost everybody claimed Durant didn't get fouled at all on first viewing though.
Most dudes on this board find the most minute thing to hate on this team with, I'm sure they'd be saying some bullshyt if RJ was called for a foul on that play.
On the contrary - I'm trying to illustrate to you that they were excusing and deflecting away from RJ not getting called from a foul by bringing up irrelevant nonsense. Sure a certain amount believed it was a foul, but they never said the Warriors were robbed because of it, and they weren't making a big deal about it. Now if the Warriors got the foul called in their favor you'd have dudes bringing up their 'history' of refs ruling in their favor and how they can't win without their help. I've read this shyt for the last two and a half seasons.you just said a bunch of nothing.. if they said warriors also got away with fouls.. then they are saying it was a foul.. if they said refs often dont call late game fouls (which is very true).. then that means they think it was a foul..and if the fould was called on RJ.. he would have been crucified for fouling..
aside from some trollin i saw.. everyone said it was a foul
On the contrary - I'm trying to illustrate to you that they were excusing and deflecting away from RJ not getting called from a foul by bringing up irrelevant nonsense. Sure a certain amount believed it was a foul, but they never said the Warriors were robbed because of it, and they weren't making a big deal about it. Now if the Warriors got the foul called in their favor you'd have dudes bringing up their 'history' of refs ruling in their favor and how they can't win without their help. I've read this shyt for the last two and a half seasons.
I mean cotdamn I've seen like 5-6 threads condemning the Warriors for losing by 1 point in that game (there's probably more but I wasn't around to see the initial reaction), but not even ONE thread when the Cavs were blown out by 30 points the other day. Clearly dudes ain't fighting fair with this shyt.
what do you think this board is composed of? a bunch of grammar school teachers who wants to encourage fairness??
news flash, your on a board filled with fans of OPPOSING teams.. get your warrior buddies to be more activist and stop complaining how opposing fans treats ya team..
it's just not what i am arguing.. i am arguing that the first game both teams played hard.. the second.. cavs mentally gave up second quarter...i did say if RJ gets called for the foul he would have been crucified.. he over played on defense...
I'm not crying about dudes not being fair, I understand why they're not. You missed the point of my post entirely.
I'm not complaining, I'm just stating that that's how this board would've reacted had Durant got a foul called on that play - you were arguing against that notion and now you're more or less agreeing with my stance.