Schooling and education are two vastly different things. Being money and power-smart requires a form of education to know how to make money and to understand the domains of power.
The educational system is antiquated, but I also believe people make a mistake by not furthering their learning much beyond school.
This isn't about individuals, but nation-states.
Books smarts will pretty much guarantee you a nice quality of life in AmericaThe mistake is thinking that “money smarts” are the only smarts that matter.
Not sure what you are trying to prove with that article OP, but High incomes correlate tightly with high levels of education.
Countries with better educated populations don't have more per capita income or geopolitical influence.
So in fact, education and income do not correlate.
It's a pretty simple point, even if it triggers education hawks.
All that learning isn't amounting to much. All these other heavy on education countries are probably suffering from malinvestment. They have put too much money into educating their populations, and have little to show for it.
If you guys want to move the goal posts and talk about individuals in the American economy instead of engaging with what I said, just say that.
Rather than consider something novel, it's much easier to not think and just parrot the party line that has been programmed by this society.
But if you want to make it domestic, Here's something to cast doubt on y'all's precious STEM.
In the US, Only a quarter of STEM grads end up doing STEM. ~75% of STEM students are wasting their time, because there will never be enough STEM jobs to justify the number of people studying it.
The numbers are here, the argument is presented.
An educated response would be, why is that?
What factors are leading countries to not capitalize on much better educated populations?
Why can't India, who graduates a magnitude more of scientist and engineers (for decades) incapable of surpassing the US in per capita income and global influence?
If China didn't replace the industrial base of the US through agreement with the US, they certainly would not have educated their way onto the global stage.
You really think that the problem with Brazil, Mexico and India is that they have over spent on education?
You think that Wikipedia article claiming Brazil and Mexico have a higher literacy rate means these countries are better educated than Americans?
I don't see an argument here, I see an attempt to troll.
I thought that Higher Learning would have a better caliber of conversation, but it's just The Locker Room with 6 Certs.
But the average American is considering voting for Trump.
Lemme be extra clear, the 70% of the white population, which is better educated than almost every group other than the Asians - majority votes against their material interests by voting Republican since at least Reagan, if not FDR.
That's "education" in action.
You really think they're that more educated than the typical Mexican or Brazilian?
There's no end to American mediocrity.
But keep moving the goal posts.
“Money” or “power” smarts rely completely on manipulating others.Books smarts will pretty much guarantee you a nice quality of life in America
Ahhh. I should have realized you are part of the TLR anti higher education brigade.
It must be insecurity in your lack of education that leads y’all to constantly bash those who are seeking to advance their formal education otherwise you’d be happy being a plumber or HVAC tech and keep it moving.
I'm trying to understand the main points of this thread, so let me try to rephrase and see if I'm understanding OP:
1. On a national level, being more formally educated doesn't correlate to gaining more power and/or income.