Microsoft defends Activision buyout by claiming that Activision doesn't make any "must have" games

Gizmo_Duck

blathering blatherskite!
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Messages
73,900
Reputation
5,477
Daps
157,007
Reppin
Duckburg, NY
Specifically, with respect to Activision Blizzard video games, there is nothing unique about the video games developed and published by Activision Blizzard that is a ‘must have’ for rival PC and console video game distributors that could give rise to a foreclosure concern,” read Microsoft’s response to the New Zealand Commerce Commission, published in a reportfrom June. That means that Microsoft don’t consider their future ownership of Activision Blizzard’s franchises such as Call Of Duty to cause issues that would prevent their rivals – among whom they identify Valve in the PC space – from competing against them.

Bear in mind that Call Of Duty alone has raked in $27 billion (£22 billion) for Activision Blizzard since the series debuted in 2003, as an earnings call revealed last year. At the time of that call, the company’s Chief Operating Officer Daniel Alegre said Call Of Duty was “one of the most successful entertainment franchises of all time”.




oprah-winfrey-so-what-is-the-truth.gif


Its been entertaining watching sony and microsoft downplay and overstate how big this acquisition is
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,801
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,447
Reppin
Harlem
They shytting on Sony's mascot :mjlol:

Activism makes all the crash bandicoot games. but yeah i don't play most of their games. except for maybe the x-men games. that deadpool game was cool too.
 

TripleAgent

Instructing Space Cowboy's mama on the blade
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
35,191
Reputation
4,959
Daps
88,561
Reppin
Baltimore
Sony does so much bettter than MS, so who cares if MS had COD to itself? :umad:
 
Top