Michael Smith is a fakkit for this

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,022
Reputation
15,922
Daps
266,189
Reppin
Oakland
If you can't see a double standard, I don't know what else to tell you.
Put it to you this way, the way Marvin Gaye's death was handled by the media would have been completely different had it happened today.
White folks happened to really dig Richard Pryor, so when he passed, there were no "complicated legacy" thinkpieces.
This ain't got nothing to do with respectability politics.
Zero.
So let’s go back to when we looked the other way on people’s crimes. Talk about not seeing double standards
 

Prynce

Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
24,722
Reputation
13,851
Daps
93,268
That's a massive false equivalency. A murder victim's past shouldn't be brought up when it had nothing to do with them being killed. That's a deflection to justify a crime. Jim Brown wasn't a victim he died of old age. Michael Smith is a journalist so he wouldn't be doing his job only talking about football, acting, and activism while ignoring his murky personal life.

Reflecting on someone's legacy means you look at everything, good or bad. When people talk about Malcolm do they leave out Detroit Red? No, because the good and bad are part of his life in totality.
Yet people don’t talk about Martins murky personal life. People pick and choose.

And I think it’s a fair comparison. When we explore the life of a victim of crime we look at everything . The same way we doing this. Why did Trayvon life get put on display of that wasn’t the case?
 

Hollywood Co

Primetime Reppin
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,701
Reputation
220
Daps
5,919
Reppin
Eastside Atl -
This is what we’ve turned into.
Attacking people as soon as they die.
Bringing up old business for internet points.
Jim = Tina

Humans with flaws…

Mourning the dead properly is not enough to get clicks and views on the internet. You gotta bring the dirt and dark parts to keep the conversation going and to get folks talking because that’s where this society loves to stay. In Darkness
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,060
Reputation
8,501
Daps
200,083
Reppin
NULL
Those stories about Elvis and John Lennon have been out there for years breh. Just because you weren't checking for them at the time doesn't mean that they didn't exist. Posters are falling into the trap of assuming that these stories about Jim Brown are only coming out now when they've been out there for years now.

Posters gotta start doing simple search instead of making false assumptions that can easily be disproven.
Boondocks made a Jim Brown woman beating joke damn near 20 years ago, not sure why people are acting like this is new information.
We’re people running in fear of Jim brown ?
I'm sure the woman he threw off the balcony tried to run:ld:

And he said they got into it because she was mad about his affair with Gloria Steinem:mjpls:
 
  • Wow
Reactions: NZA

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,453
Reputation
8,346
Daps
99,169
Who says that he wasn’t though? Deadspin posted a story about it years ago while he was still alive and others did as well.

Brown denied the allegations in every case. “I’m no angel,” he told The Plain Dealer in 1970. But regarding the allegations, he said, “I’ve never been convicted. I’ve just been harassed. I’ve been hit so much I don’t sting any more.”

When facing such controversies, he added, “I take it and look my accuser in the eye. I don’t look at my shoes when I talk to anybody. I know what I am. I only have to live with myself.”


Are Michael Smith and Bomani leaving room for the idea he may have been set up. One instance I saw being bought up was him throwing a woman out a window. But when I looked into it further,the woman said she jumped out the window when the cops came. And in the other instances the women recanted. Plus what complicates things is that slapping your woman was deemed okay. So judging him from our refrence today is a little unfair. Jim Brown has never been convicted of his crimes from what I saw. And it was the 1960s where theres plenty of evidence of black men being set up:manny:


If you want to talk about nuance and how complicated it is. Why not bring up those ideas as well?
 

keond

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
24,444
Reputation
11,579
Daps
205,465
Reppin
ATLANTA
Dude was a complicated man. Some of his dirt is a part of his legacy, you don’t make people into complete angels when they die. My only gripe is that Michael Smith is a person that always seems to lead with the bad when it comes to blk athletes.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,453
Reputation
8,346
Daps
99,169
That's a massive false equivalency. A murder victim's past shouldn't be brought up when it had nothing to do with them being killed. That's a deflection to justify a crime. Jim Brown wasn't a victim he died of old age. Michael Smith is a journalist so he wouldn't be doing his job only talking about football, acting, and activism while ignoring his murky personal life.

Reflecting on someone's legacy means you look at everything, good or bad. When people talk about Malcolm do they leave out Detroit Red? No, because the good and bad are part of his life in totality.


You dont see the difference in coli posters and Michael Smith? Like you said its their jobs to talk about sports. You cant tell me they just now learned about this stuff with Jim Brown. They have a platform,and Im sure have talked about Jim Brown before. Acting like you suddenly give a damn rubs me the wrong way. You couldve held him accountable plenty of times on your t.v shows,columns,podcast. While the man was still living,but you didnt want that "why you tearing a black man like Jim Brown down" smoke. So these cowards waited til they saw smoke from the lymchmobs torches,before they grabbed their pitchfork and started poking:mjlol:
 

bigde09

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
8,258
Reputation
1,621
Daps
45,644
Reppin
NULL
A lot of you nikkas can’t handle the truth about certain things. I only look up to people I actually know. These entertainers and athletes are not heroes.
She was definitely :mjpls: :mjpls: :mjpls: and what we saw in that movie was nowhere near close to what it really was.
Ike was no saint, by any stretch, but that movie was cap deluxe.
Ike signed off on that movie. If Ike knew how that film was going to permanently taint his legacy, he wouldn't have.
When Tina passed, I did not slander her. I wished her a peaceful rest and stayed quiet.
It's not hard to do.
Tina was most definitely not an angel. Kinda similar to Bobby Brown and Whitney. Everyone assumed Bobby corrupted her and was the bad guy in the relationship when Whitney was no saint from the beginning.
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,060
Reputation
8,501
Daps
200,083
Reppin
NULL
You dont see the difference in coli posters and Michael Smith? Like you said its their jobs to talk about sports. You cant tell me they just now learned about this stuff with Jim Brown. They have a platform,and Im sure have talked about Jim Brown before. Acting like you suddenly give a damn rubs me the wrong way. You couldve held him accountable plenty of times on your t.v shows,columns,podcast. While the man was still living,but you didnt want that "why you tearing a black man like Jim Brown down" smoke. So these cowards waited til they saw smoke from the lymchmobs torches,before they grabbed their pitchfork and started poking:mjlol:
Article from Sports Illustrated in 2015 that discusses his domestic violence


Not sure why people are acting that this was a topic people never touched until now.
 
Top