"Men need to boycott marriage! Marriage isnt worth the risk" (video)

[Pursuit & Seduction]

Nothing really. It was just a general response to the responses that came from our conversation. All these men coming to your rescue are being hypocrites because you started the whole thing and you weren't really even offended by what I wrote. I just find it funny that people always want to dip in our conversations like they even halfway know the dynamics of our e-relationship.

They are trying to take your spot as the poster that I don't get along with but still pay attention to.

Who are you, though???? Who gives a FUCCK about you! Stop making yourself feel important, tramp. It's the gawt damn internet, my man.

 

[Zapp Brannigan]

links?

graphs?

sources?

Does this help? You didn't seem to notice this before.

 

[SouthernBelle]

You got it wrong. Having kids out of wedlock shot up under the rise of feminism which pushed for special welfare for women and their fatherless kids and no-fault divorce. There is a direct correlation to the introduction of no-fault divorce/changes in welfare and out of wedlock births. The funny thing is the introduction of the pill and the Roe v Wade case led to more out of wedlock births. The more forms of birth control women have at their disposal the more likely they are to have out of wedlock births

Now raising a kid without a father has become a cultural thing that many black women prefer. It is has been socially engineered through government policy.

Do you mind citing the source of that information? Because I have a lot of sources that cite economics and structural inequality (job restructuring, spatial mismatch, high unemployment rates, and etc) as the cause for the decline in black marriage rates and rise in out of wedlock births following the Civil Rights movement (specifically in the black community). The Truly Disadvantaged is one. In fact, this book, using a landmark Harvard University study, completely dismisses the relationship between welfare and out of wedlock births. I can provide more sources if you want them. I would be interested in reading your sources so I can compare the studies and come to a more informed conclusion.

Here is a link to a summary of the book: http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/wilson-disadvantaged.html

I look forward to reading your sources when you shoot them my way

 

[The Coochie Assassin]

Do you mind citing the source of that information? Because I have a lot of sources that cite economics and structural inequality (job restructuring, spatial mismatch, high unemployment rates, and etc) as the cause for the decline in black marriage rates and rise in out of wedlock births following the Civil Rights movement (specifically in the black community). The Truly Disadvantaged is one. In fact, this book, using a landmark Harvard University study, completely dismisses the relationship between welfare and out of wedlock births. I can provide more sources if you want them. I would be interested in reading your sources so I can compare the studies and come to a more informed conclusion.

Here is a link to a summary of the book: http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/wilson-disadvantaged.html

I look forward to reading your sources when you shoot them my way

So basically when brothas started to lose they job and businesses after the so called Civil Rights movement, sistas said I don't need u and hopped on welfare. I still see a connection.

 

[SouthernBelle]

So basically when brothas started to lose they job and businesses after the so called Civil Rights movement, sistas said I don't need u and hopped on welfare. I still see a connection.

No. Again, welfare had nothing to do with it. If you haven't read the book, how could you even come to that conclusion? I mean you could have read the New York Times article I posted about the book and see that is the opposite of what happened (following feminism, the civil rights movement, and etc...out of wedlock births rose, but the number of women/children on welfare actually declined). I was trying to have an adult conversation and bring some actual research (and maybe get some in return). If that's not what you're look for then we have nothing to talk about. Idk why I even tried.