JerseyBoy23
Veteran
I genuinely want to know. Why is his opinion the most important? How does he determine the star ratings?
Oh he determines it by lack of botches, match build up, how well he liked the match, crowd noise.
I genuinely want to know. Why is his opinion the most important? How does he determine the star ratings?
4 stars is a good rating thoBlack/Dream is a bit low
4 stars is a good rating tho
Exactly. Idk why people hold it to the standards they do, high or low. Its just some dudes opinion.Cause it’s to spur a conversation with fellow wrestling fans to hear their opinions on the which matches were better.
Put any of those NXT matches under either of the main brand and he would've scored them 1-2 stars lower
He legitimately adds a full star to non mainroster wwe. It's so silly and transparent.Almas vs Drew ain't 4 stars
And he gave 3 stars to Ohno vs Sullivan
3 stars for that glorified squash
He legitimately adds a full star to non mainroster wwe. It's so silly and transparent.
The first one (this year) was a 5What would you give Omega/Okada? 6 is a bit much but yes still high up there for me
Oh he determines it by lack of botches, match build up, how well he liked the match, crowd noise.
In this day and age there's an obsession from fans of any form of entertainment to get their own opinions validated.
If that is the case, then no way Cena vs Punk MITB 2011 was a 5 star match based on that criteria