Meltzer's Ratings For Takeover: War Games And Survivor Series Revealed

JerseyBoy23

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
29,567
Reputation
4,095
Daps
71,041
Reppin
Essex County, NJ
Thought I'd share these with my TSC brehs on this Thanksgiving. Any thoughts on these ratings?

Takeover:

Lars vs. Ohno 3

Black vs. Dream 4

Ember vs. Nikki vs. Kairi vs. Peyton 3.25

Almas vs. Drew 4

War Games 4.5

Survivor Series:

Elias vs. Matt Hardy .25

Enzo vs. Kalisto 1.5

KO/Zayn vs. Breezango 1.25

Shield vs. New Day 3.75

Women's Elimination 2.5

Baron vs. Miz 2.75

Usos vs. Bar 3.5

Charlotte vs. Bliss 2.5

Lesnar vs. AJ Styles 4.25

Men's Elimination 1.75
 

TOAD99

Veteran
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
25,254
Reputation
3,925
Daps
101,707
Thought I'd share these with my TSC brehs on this Thanksgiving. Any thoughts on these ratings?

Takeover:

Lars vs. Ohno 3

Black vs. Dream 4

Ember vs. Nikki vs. Kairi vs. Peyton 3.25

Almas vs. Drew 4

War Games 4.5

Survivor Series:

Elias vs. Matt Hardy .25

Enzo vs. Kalisto 1.5

KO/Zayn vs. Breezango 1.25

Shield vs. New Day 3.75

Women's Elimination 2.5

Baron vs. Miz 2.75

Usos vs. Bar 3.5

Charlotte vs. Bliss 2.5

Lesnar vs. AJ Styles 4.25

Men's Elimination 1.75

Shield vs New Day was definitely better than Almas vs Drew.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
122,983
Reputation
8,332
Daps
145,341
Reppin
Westcoast
The Bar/Usos match were good...new day vs Shield was good..War Games was alright...Dream vs Black was good..and Styles vs Lesnar was much better than expected. The end of the women's match with Asuka was a stand out too
 

JerseyBoy23

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
29,567
Reputation
4,095
Daps
71,041
Reppin
Essex County, NJ
I honestly don't understand why people have started acting like Meltzer ratings matter again just because he gave some match 6 out of 5 stars.:why:

Why does his opinion matter?

Cause it’s to spur a conversation with fellow wrestling fans to hear their opinions on the which matches were better.
 

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
860
Daps
60,082
Reppin
NULL
Cause it’s to spur a conversation with fellow wrestling fans to hear their opinions on the which matches were better.
I genuinely want to know. Why is his opinion the most important? How does he determine the star ratings?
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,209
Reputation
5,828
Daps
108,610
Reppin
Chile
I honestly don't understand why people have started acting like Meltzer ratings matter again just because he gave some match 6 out of 5 stars.:why:

I thought the whole 6 stars and 6 1/4 stars shyt was finally going to expose how ridiculous is to take Dave's ratings seriously. Unless you just wanna have fun with it and troll I honestly don't see any purpose on his views, specially given how shytty his taste is when it comes to current wrestling :heh:

Cause it’s to spur a conversation with fellow wrestling fans to hear their opinions on the which matches were better.

You really don't need Dave's snowflakes to start a thread about which matches were better. Specially here in TSC :manny:

I genuinely want to know. Why is his opinion the most important? How does he determine the star ratings?

I think at this point there's a group who legit takes his ratings seriously because they see him as a sort of "Roger Ebert of wrestling" when it comes to match quality - which is fukking :mjlol: by itself but that's another topic - and in this day and age there's an obsession from fans of any form of entertainment to get their own opinions validated. Given that Dave is oldest and "most respected" wrestling journalist/critic, his views on stuff get dissected and talked about more than any other person.

It's fukking :snoop: but it seems it will never go away.
 
Last edited:
Top