Art, respectfully, I don’t think nikkas give a fukk about match rating and rants. That’s for a niche audience
The stories are pro wrestlings selling point
The matches are works or stories.
So why no review of these works or stories.
If the public is over 27 years of age.
They are an adult.
That they need to offer critical analyais of material. To authenicate and warrant purchase. Plus authenicate drawing receipts of said work.
These are adults.
We are not children.
Why are there no reviews of these stories?
Plus critical analysis. Whether or not these works.
or stories are detrimental to people.
who are under 27 years of age's well being and development. Mentally, physically and economically.
Especially mentally and economically. As you can not have material detriment to minors development on a public or private stage or sector. That breeds deviance and or financial insecurity. As it creates civil unrest, mayhem and economic deviance. Detrimental to society.
So where is the critical analysis of these stories.
Art Barr