McDonalds testing out voice ordering system to replace cashiers

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,427
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,292
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
yea because everything will go to hell when a person can’t find a 7.25 per hour job :mjlol:
I think you might want to study economics more.. Because if the avg person can't find a job that pays at least $7.25, it WILL fall apart.. You think they just going to keep getting rid of entire job industries and things will keep on trucking?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,856
Reputation
19,591
Daps
202,371
Reppin
the ether
Right when they're talking about increasing wages, here comes the replacements. This country is on a collision course with something and it ain't good.

Y’all thought they was gonna pay cashiers more than $10 an hour? :mjlol:

Increased wages is almost completely irrelevant. Do you really think the perfect price point that getting rid of a worker makes sense is the magic slot between $10/hour and $15/hour, when you're comparing to an AI that don't ask for a daily wage at all?

If they think the public will accept it, they will adopt the technology ASAP once it becomes technologically feasible at an upfront coast they're willing to pay. And technology declines in price so rapidly that wage differences are already irrelevant. Whatever technology puts $14/hour workers out of work this year is going to put $10/hour workers out of work next year, congrats on lasting an extra year in a job that doesn't even pay you enough to live on.
 

1thouwow

Poster of the Year
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
26,344
Reputation
-255
Daps
72,783
Increased wages is almost completely irrelevant. Do you really think the perfect price point that getting rid of a worker makes sense is the magic slot between $10/hour and $15/hour, when you're comparing to an AI that don't ask for a daily wage at all?

If they think the public will accept it, they will adopt the technology ASAP once it becomes technologically feasible at an upfront coast they're willing to pay. And technology declines in price so rapidly that wage differences are already irrelevant. Whatever technology puts $14/hour workers out of work this year is going to put $10/hour workers out of work next year, congrats on lasting an extra year in a job that doesn't even pay you enough to live on.
tenor.gif
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,427
Reputation
7,644
Daps
98,292
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
Increased wages is almost completely irrelevant. Do you really think the perfect price point that getting rid of a worker makes sense is the magic slot between $10/hour and $15/hour, when you're comparing to an AI that don't ask for a daily wage at all?

If they think the public will accept it, they will adopt the technology ASAP once it becomes technologically feasible at an upfront coast they're willing to pay. And technology declines in price so rapidly that wage differences are already irrelevant. Whatever technology puts $14/hour workers out of work this year is going to put $10/hour workers out of work next year, congrats on lasting an extra year in a job that doesn't even pay you enough to live on.
Doubling all your employees wages is not anything a business can easily do. In fact, with the way labor wages have risen in the past, there was no reasonable thought for any business to think it'd double in less than 50 years from now..

The minimum wage was $3.10 in 1981. It's now $7.25 in 2021.. that's $4.15 of increase in 40 YEARS breh.. Now government talking about a $7.75 increase in one year. They want to increase it by more than 100%. Any business that relies on paying their employees shyt wages, like McDonald's, would go into panic mode. And most of these places are franchises anyway. They could choose to keep their employees, but hell nah. They willing to risk new equipment that might not even work properly or have your customers angry.

Yes technology is there. Yes they are always going to look to cut jobs. But so is every industry. They all wish they could hire robots who don't need money, time off, set hours, and more. But low income paying companies are definitely rushing to get these people out of there before that $15 goes in effect. Any good businessman would.
 
Last edited:

Elim Garak

Veteran
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
37,595
Reputation
6,385
Daps
179,401
Hopefully it's fails old people in the United States hate dealing with technology when it comes to services. They will find this shyt difficult to use and will not be happy with it.
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
40,655
Reputation
9,064
Daps
148,869
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
Increased wages is almost completely irrelevant. Do you really think the perfect price point that getting rid of a worker makes sense is the magic slot between $10/hour and $15/hour, when you're comparing to an AI that don't ask for a daily wage at all?

If they think the public will accept it, they will adopt the technology ASAP once it becomes technologically feasible at an upfront coast they're willing to pay. And technology declines in price so rapidly that wage differences are already irrelevant. Whatever technology puts $14/hour workers out of work this year is going to put $10/hour workers out of work next year, congrats on lasting an extra year in a job that doesn't even pay you enough to live on.
I've never seen so many "Black" people unconcerned with the utter destruction of everything around them like this... it's puzzling

I want to say it's an education thing but we're talking basic adult shyt here: Cost of living is increasing and wages are flat and have been flat across the board
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,856
Reputation
19,591
Daps
202,371
Reppin
the ether
The minimum wage was $3.10 in 1981. It's now $7.25 in 2021.. that's $4.15 of increase in 40 YEARS breh..
That's a circular argument. You're literally saying, "They went so long without raising the minimum wage, so we shouldn't raise the minimum wage."

CEO compensation has increased by 940% in that same time. During the same period that they "couldn't afford" to raise the minimum wage, they've had no problem jacking up CEO money like crazy. Funny how that works.

CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978: Typical worker compensation has risen only 12% during that time


Here's a different way of looking at it. Minimum wage was raised to $2.00 in 1974. By 1991, just 17 years later, that had more than doubled to $4.25. So at that rate it should have been $9.00 in 2008 and $20.00 in 2025. But you're using the fact that wages have barely budged in 30 years as an argument for why they shouldn't be increasing now. That's backwards.

Yes, businesses are always going to try to depress labor costs. They ALWAYS are doing that. That's the whole reason why a minimum wage law had to be passed in the first place. Is your solution to just bend over and take it?
 
Top