Theirs a difference between putting millions(possibly hundred+ million) into an investment which could see a major returnSo this is different than when Hov had a small percentage of ownership in the Nets?
Cause I remember in them threads folk were saying Hov didn’t “own” anything or his piece was so small he was a nobody. But Money May have a small percentage in a “skyscraper” and he justified in saying he own it?
Make it make sense
And jay-z having 0.06% of the nets as a marketing ploy.
“Forbes claimed that Jay-Z owned just 0.066% of the New Jersey Nets - a stake that was valued at just $350,000”