Maybe America is that Dumb. How do you Lose a Debate When..the other guy refuses to explain how he will do whatever he says he will do?
whats there to debate about?
for instance.
lets say I'm obeezy. and me and mitt both have different of opinions in how to lets say get across the ocean to china. lets say the only way to do this is to Fly in a plane or take a boat. lets assume we already know there is no underwater tunnel that can do it. the are no jetpacks that can do it. just planes and boats
So when the moderator asks us How would you get across the ocean to china?
Obeezy" Well.. i would first pack my stuff for a long trip, buy a ticket, head down to the airport and get on a plane."
moderator: and you mr Romney
Mitt:" Well. I would also like mr president pack stuff and get ready for a long trip. but where we differ, is that i dont think obama's idea of buying a plane ticket has worked for the american people. it hasnt worked. "
moderator: so mr Romney how are YOU going to get across to china?
mitt: " WEll like i said, me and obeezy dont agree on that. i think you get there another way. and that way will suit the american people better then mr obama's way that has failed the last 4 years."
Obama: so let me get this straight mr romney, you wont tell us how you WILL get across the water to china. and i'm telling you there is no other way to get there since you have to take a plane. Therefore, how can you say you wont do it my way(taking a plane) when taking a plane is the only way you can do it. unless you're going to take a boat which will take even longer then the plane. So citizens. here's a sharp contrast between me and my opponent. If you want to take forever to get across the water or may not make it at all, because your boat and mitts boat will be different. his boat will be a luxury liner along with other corporate big wigs. and yours may be okay or may not be.
Mitt: obeezy just because you keep saying it, doesnt make it so.
Obama: well Mitt if your plan is so great. why are you hiding it? HOw will you get across the water to CHINA. We're waiting (ques jeopardy music).
thats the debate in a nutshell . MItt never answers that question thoroughly. he finally caved in and gave his answer when he said he wont go into office knowing what he will do he wants to first sit down with everyone then take it from there. See there's nothing wrong with that approach on its face. the problem is, what LEADER do you know approaches a problem with out an idea of his own solution beyond "i know one thing we wont do it that way. but i'm not sure how we will do it. i dont have a clue right now. but it wont be that way." thats not a leader. thats a person like me and you just talking on the porch/stoop somewhere. leaders have to come in with an idea of what they would LIKE to implement. then work within the framework to paint that picture the best they can with what they are working with.
So basically if you vote for mitt. you have no IDEA what he will do beyond "not do what obeezy has done already."
so again. Where's the debate?
i cant debate you if you never give me your policies and how you will get to those policies. the truth is, if you give me that info. you know and i know i will poke so many holes in it, it will look like swiss cheese. this is why you REFUSE to answer those simple questions. YOU yourself know the plan you are hinting at just to get voted in wont work at all. therefore you have something else up your sleeve. something that you cant show the american people. something that will make them NOT vote for you. again how can i debate when the other guy is lying and not giving us his policies? there's nothing to discuss. thats why OBeezy was looking like that.
i cant talk to a child going "naa naa...naa naa..naaaaa" with his hands over his ears.
folks i just want you to realize this is unprecedented . for a presidential candidate to have differing policy ideas then the guy already in office. but yet never explain how he THINKS he will implement his differing policies. even young Bush explained what he was going to do and how he would get around to doing it. even if you didnt like it. he explained it.
whats there to debate about?
for instance.
lets say I'm obeezy. and me and mitt both have different of opinions in how to lets say get across the ocean to china. lets say the only way to do this is to Fly in a plane or take a boat. lets assume we already know there is no underwater tunnel that can do it. the are no jetpacks that can do it. just planes and boats
So when the moderator asks us How would you get across the ocean to china?
Obeezy" Well.. i would first pack my stuff for a long trip, buy a ticket, head down to the airport and get on a plane."
moderator: and you mr Romney
Mitt:" Well. I would also like mr president pack stuff and get ready for a long trip. but where we differ, is that i dont think obama's idea of buying a plane ticket has worked for the american people. it hasnt worked. "
moderator: so mr Romney how are YOU going to get across to china?
mitt: " WEll like i said, me and obeezy dont agree on that. i think you get there another way. and that way will suit the american people better then mr obama's way that has failed the last 4 years."
Obama: so let me get this straight mr romney, you wont tell us how you WILL get across the water to china. and i'm telling you there is no other way to get there since you have to take a plane. Therefore, how can you say you wont do it my way(taking a plane) when taking a plane is the only way you can do it. unless you're going to take a boat which will take even longer then the plane. So citizens. here's a sharp contrast between me and my opponent. If you want to take forever to get across the water or may not make it at all, because your boat and mitts boat will be different. his boat will be a luxury liner along with other corporate big wigs. and yours may be okay or may not be.
Mitt: obeezy just because you keep saying it, doesnt make it so.
Obama: well Mitt if your plan is so great. why are you hiding it? HOw will you get across the water to CHINA. We're waiting (ques jeopardy music).
thats the debate in a nutshell . MItt never answers that question thoroughly. he finally caved in and gave his answer when he said he wont go into office knowing what he will do he wants to first sit down with everyone then take it from there. See there's nothing wrong with that approach on its face. the problem is, what LEADER do you know approaches a problem with out an idea of his own solution beyond "i know one thing we wont do it that way. but i'm not sure how we will do it. i dont have a clue right now. but it wont be that way." thats not a leader. thats a person like me and you just talking on the porch/stoop somewhere. leaders have to come in with an idea of what they would LIKE to implement. then work within the framework to paint that picture the best they can with what they are working with.
So basically if you vote for mitt. you have no IDEA what he will do beyond "not do what obeezy has done already."
so again. Where's the debate?
i cant debate you if you never give me your policies and how you will get to those policies. the truth is, if you give me that info. you know and i know i will poke so many holes in it, it will look like swiss cheese. this is why you REFUSE to answer those simple questions. YOU yourself know the plan you are hinting at just to get voted in wont work at all. therefore you have something else up your sleeve. something that you cant show the american people. something that will make them NOT vote for you. again how can i debate when the other guy is lying and not giving us his policies? there's nothing to discuss. thats why OBeezy was looking like that.
i cant talk to a child going "naa naa...naa naa..naaaaa" with his hands over his ears.
folks i just want you to realize this is unprecedented . for a presidential candidate to have differing policy ideas then the guy already in office. but yet never explain how he THINKS he will implement his differing policies. even young Bush explained what he was going to do and how he would get around to doing it. even if you didnt like it. he explained it.
