nineteeneightysix
Banned
hahaha...But you will still have two circles with one circle superimposed on the other one...One circle plus another circle of equal size could equal one circle of a larger circumference
hahaha...But you will still have two circles with one circle superimposed on the other one...One circle plus another circle of equal size could equal one circle of a larger circumference
fact:terrible response from a terrible poster/moderator.
The arabic symbols used to describe numbers are arbitrary, as there is no factual basis for 2 being the only and correct symbol representing the quantity of two any more factual than as represented as II in roman numerals.
Nah i think mathematically it's just a bigger 1 star...So if I 1star a thread that is already a 1 star thread....will it be a 2 star thread?
Let's find out
Nah i think mathematically it's just a bigger 1 star..
fact:
Adding no apples to no apples results in NO apples...not "2 no apples".
If you can't grasp the FACT that symbols are representative of concepts then you're beyond help...OR RATHER
try that.
hahaha...But you will still have two circles with one circle superimposed on the other one...
this nukka slang would score F in a math class and argue with the teacher how F doesn't represent failing...
1+1=11And yet you still haven't read nor grasped the content of the OP
Where do you get your idiocy from? Adding ONE to another ONE equals double ONE, or do you have trouble typing on your keyboard two ONES in sequence?
Not if you pixelate the circles into individual units and recombine them into a larger circle.
1+1=11
i'm not entirely sure it's trolling thoughFantastic display of trolling demonstrated in this thread.
so 1+1=2 could be dis proven?