Nah.
The entirety of ME3 was great until the ending. And watching the ending before the dlc, I didn't have too many problems with it. People get into an echo chamber and their opinion some how becomes fact and they start to sway others opinions. Like the opinion that ME1 gameplay being horrible somehow makes the game better. shyt is ridiculous.
And what you brining up Andromeda for? Casey ain't have nothing to do with that game.
The ME trilogy got better with each game story wise and gameplay wise. Y'all gone have to miss me with the bs.
Breh....again....you need to look at shyt
OBJECTIVELY.
"ME1" was a success. Sold well, critically acclaimed, etc. It don't matter if you dislike it, I'm talking about
reality. Not my opinion....not a few people....you can go watch old reviews from critics and read fan reactions that came out
when the game was new....people loved it. Whether or not you want to accept that is irrelevant.
Likewise, the ending of "ME3"
was not well received. You say the game was great "until the ending"....ok, cool. Casey Hudson is directly responsible for the ending....so again, how am I "bugging" for saying he ruined the franchise?
"Well, opinion becomes fact and it starts to sway people"....look man, just say you like 3 and KIM. Anything beyond that is you trying to explain to people that received the game in real time why their reactions aren't genuine....which honestly, is silly as fukk. Especially in light of how things turned out for the series.
Especially when you're late to the party and trying to shoehorn your opinion into the narrative 6+ years too late.
Lastly, I'm bringing up "Andromeda" because it's the end result of everything else I'm talking about. And it put the series on ice for the foreseeable future. It don't matter if you like it, it don't matter if you think it's better than 1. All that shyt is completely irrelevant.
Fred.