Evans can't even carry his own movie
Pretend Winter Soldier didn't hpapen, brehs.
Evans can't even carry his own movie
Jon Bernthal did fine breh
You're taking a quote about a $20 million picture and you just take that as fact for every picture when it simply doesn't work that way, breh. Especially since The Revenant was pretty originally slated to be made for less than 90 million before the long, grueling production that forced the costs up higher.
So how about you show us the actual receipts instead of making wild assumptions based on one financer's experience on a movie that was made on a budget of about 15% of The Revenant's budget.
You have problems reading and thats fine, just don't argue with me because you fail to be able to read and comprehend.
Now I told you already P&A is typically equal to the budget of a sub 100 mil movie and showed you proof of that from an investor or how P&A is accounted for and the general rules of the game in budgeting. Not really left to talk about man.
The Revenant had 140 mil spent on it and was a major release, once they had all that money in it they had to advertise it as what they budgeted a event film, and they did.
You show me the actual receipts to verify your point. I've shown actual investor experience and general rules for budgeting filmms in hollywood. Have a good one though.
How about you show me actual receipts of The Revenant's marketing costing $150 million, instead of making an assumption based on a statement by one single investor who says that it's becoming more typical in Hollywood. Because nowhere in that statement is there any actual proof that in the case of The Revenant, they did spend an equal amount of money on the movie's marketing as they did on actually producing, and since you based your entire narrative of the movie not breaking even on that assumption, there's no actual proof because you don't have the actual numbers.
How about you show me actual receipts of The Revenant's marketing costing $150 million, instead of making an assumption based on a statement by one single investor who says that it's becoming more typical in Hollywood. Because nowhere in that statement is there any actual proof that in the case of The Revenant, they did spend an equal amount of money on the movie's marketing as they did on actually producing, and since you based your entire narrative of the movie not breaking even on that assumption, there's no actual proof because you don't have the actual numbers.
I can't just like I can't show you receipts of production costs and can only go off released or speculated info released by the company.
If the company releases the info like WB did Harry Potter you can get actual receipts, but until then neither of us have concrete details on the financial underlyings of any movie.
That said, again I'm going off standard knowledge of cost from industry analyst, which is if a movie costs 150 mil its in the tent pole range and their marketing cost will most likely be 150.
When you have anything to actually support your stance though, I'll be right here waiting.
The Revenant isn't a tentpole movie though and its budget wasn't even supposed to pass $100 million but they ran into a lot of trouble during production, so they sure as hell did not spend 150 million on marketing. That's going off standard logic so without receipts, I guess that ends the debate.
This isn't going to end well at all. So basically they want a scary black guy to play the villain