Marshall Faulk's Standing Amongst the All Time Great RBs

SEC Hater

Pro
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
1,193
Reputation
-20
Daps
935
Reppin
NULL
LT yards per carry - 4.3

Faulk yards per carry - 4.3


What are you all :stopitslime: about?

You're reading into these yardage stats way too much

Jamaal Charles is the all time leader in yards per carry by a RB, so by your logic not only is he a better runner than both Faulk and LT, but he is by far the greatest runner of all time.

Carson Palmer averages 237 passing ypg, the same as Brett Favre, more than Jim Kelly, Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Joe Montana. So I guess when we talk about all time greats you have to throw Palmer in the mix.

4 years of 2000 yards from scrimmage is nice, but even Larry Johnson has 2 seasons of 2000 yards from scrimmage.

You can talk about the stats all you want, but nobody in their right mind will ever say that Faulk was a better runner than LT.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,489
Reputation
10,621
Daps
231,281
The LT/Faulk argument is one of the most intriguing football arguments there is.

I don't think anyone can have a "hands down" argument over the other.

You just can't.
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-290
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
You're reading into these yardage stats way too much

Jamaal Charles is the all time leader in yards per carry by a RB, so by your logic not only is he a better runner than both Faulk and LT, but he is by far the greatest runner of all time.

Carson Palmer averages 237 passing ypg, the same as Brett Favre, more than Jim Kelly, Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Joe Montana. So I guess when we talk about all time greats you have to throw Palmer in the mix.

4 years of 2000 yards from scrimmage is nice, but even Larry Johnson has 2 seasons of 2000 yards from scrimmage.

You can talk about the stats all you want, but nobody in their right mind will ever say that Faulk was a better runner than LT.

No need for all the hyperbole.

We're comparing two very comparable all-time greats. What does Jamaal Charles have to do with anything? Let's keep it on context here.

YOU'RE the one making the claim that LT was such a better runner, yet the stats prove that Faulk was just as productive carrying the ball as LT was, without some huge disparity in carries (like a Jamaal Charles or any other player you're going to attempt to throw in). (4) seasons of over 2,000 yards from scrimmage is an NFL RECORD, so please stop with these attempts to tie in scrubs.
 

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
23,665
Reputation
3,749
Daps
75,497
The LT/Faulk argument is one of the most intriguing football arguments there is.

I don't think anyone can have a "hands down" argument over the other.

You just can't.

Exactly how I feel. I go with Faulk cause to me there was nothing he couldn't do on the field. People often overlook how Faulk was the true center of the Rams dynamic offense and the fact he was still able to put up the crazy numbers he did with the talent that was around speaks of his skills.

But then LT did do the same thing for a few years himself and for some time was the lone SD weapon and had defenses keying on him and was still killing it.
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-290
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
The LT/Faulk argument is one of the most intriguing football arguments there is.

I don't think anyone can have a "hands down" argument over the other.

You just can't.

I could see that.. Just funny to me when cats say things like "no one in their right mind" would pick one over the other. Shiiit.. MF was the ultimate offensive X-factor.
 

RugbyMan

Pro
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
656
Reputation
30
Daps
1,010
Reppin
NULL
The LT/Faulk argument is one of the most intriguing football arguments there is.

I don't think anyone can have a "hands down" argument over the other.

You just can't.

:ehh:Agreed

Growing up in Texas, I've been an LT fan since he played at TCU. But I'd give the slight edge to Faulk just bc I think he puts a little more stress on a defense. You can't go wrong with either one, it just depends what style of play you prefer.

But for these Cowboy stans that wanna rank Emmit Smith so high, I gotta hit them with the :beli: Emmit was solid, but he would've been Otis Anderson-status if he hadn't played with the GOAT offensive line, a top-notch WR, a monster TE, and one of the best QBs of that era. Give Barry Sanders that supporting cast and :ohlawd:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,489
Reputation
10,621
Daps
231,281
:ehh:Agreed

Growing up in Texas, I've been an LT fan since he played at TCU. But I'd give the slight edge to Faulk just bc I think he puts a little more stress on a defense. You can't go wrong with either one, it just depends what style of play you prefer.

But for these Cowboy stans that wanna rank Emmit Smith so high, I gotta hit them with the :beli: Emmit was solid, but he would've been Otis Anderson-status if he hadn't played with the GOAT offensive line, a top-notch WR, a monster TE, and one of the best QBs of that era. Give Barry Sanders that supporting cast and :ohlawd:
I thought LT was benefitted off of that TCU offense until I saw that Senior Bowl game where he toyed around with everyone on the field like they were children leaving me like :ohhh:

I knew Marshall was the real deal when he ran for 130 against the fast Hurricanes....outrunning the 91, 92 Hurricanes....outrunning them!!!

They're both are almost equals to me.
 

SEC Hater

Pro
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
1,193
Reputation
-20
Daps
935
Reppin
NULL
No need for all the hyperbole.

We're comparing two very comparable all-time greats. What does Jamaal Charles have to do with anything? Let's keep it on context here.

YOU'RE the one making the claim that LT was such a better runner, yet the stats prove that Faulk was just as productive carrying the ball as LT was, without some huge disparity in carries (like a Jamaal Charles or any other player you're going to attempt to throw in). (4) seasons of over 2,000 yards from scrimmage is an NFL RECORD, so please stop with these attempts to tie in scrubs.

I brought up Jamaal Charles because you posted yards per carry as if it would prove who was the better runner. YPC do not show who the better runner is.

Exactly how I feel. I go with Faulk cause to me there was nothing he couldn't do on the field. People often overlook how Faulk was the true center of the Rams dynamic offense and the fact he was still able to put up the crazy numbers he did with the talent that was around speaks of his skills.

But then LT did do the same thing for a few years himself and for some time was the lone SD weapon and had defenses keying on him and was still killing it.

Exactly. Teams knew it was all about LT, and he still punished them. Teams couldnt key on Faulk like that. They couldnt stack the box when you had Warner under center and ****, Bruce and Az Hakim out there for him to throw to. The Rams passed to open the run, not the opposite, and that helped Faulks running. Look at the YPC when he was with the Colts as compared to when he was with the Rams, it shot way up because teams couldnt key on him, whereas everybody knew the ball was going to LT, and he still beasted.

Who's the better overall player? Thats a toss up. But I don't see how in the hell anybody could ever say Faulk is the better runner. There a ton of backs I would take over Faulk in just straight up running ability
 

Larry David

Rookie
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
75
Reputation
0
Daps
108
Reppin
NULL
That's why I hit homeboy with the :ufdup:

Jim Brown is the GOAT and if he's not at least in somebody's top 5 I can't take 'em all that serious :aicmon:

reading is fundamental.

I said those were the top 5 RBs that i watched play in my lifetime.

Im 29, born in 83.

All i know of Jim Brown is the same as everyone else in this forum, i know his stats, his rep, his highlights, and his all time rank.....didnt have the privilege of growing up watching him play.
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-290
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
I brought up Jamaal Charles because you posted yards per carry as if it would prove who was the better runner. YPC do not show who the better runner is.



Exactly. Teams knew it was all about LT, and he still punished them. Teams couldnt key on Faulk like that. They couldnt stack the box when you had Warner under center and ****, Bruce and Az Hakim out there for him to throw to. The Rams passed to open the run, not the opposite, and that helped Faulks running. Look at the YPC when he was with the Colts as compared to when he was with the Rams, it shot way up because teams couldnt key on him, whereas everybody knew the ball was going to LT, and he still beasted.

Who's the better overall player? Thats a toss up. But I don't see how in the hell anybody could ever say Faulk is the better runner. There a ton of backs I would take over Faulk in just straight up running ability
Yeah, there are a TON of guys that run better than the #10 all-time leading rusher in NFL history. fukk outta here.
 
Top