Nobody who ever saw Marshall Faulk run the ball could ever make a statement like there are a "TON" of backs that run better than him. You obviously don't know shyt about football or hate Marshall Faulk to make an absurd statement like that.
There has been a good discussion in here from people who actually know football. Picking between MF/LT is splitting hairs. You're the only one making dumb statements, bringing up dumb analogies to try and make some point that doesn't exist (Jamaal Charles, Carson Palmer, Larry Johnson). And now Bettis was a better "runner" than Faulk because he ended with more yards?? Did you ever actually watch these two running backs run the ball??
Please shut the fukk up and stop ruining the thread.
Was about to ask you the same thing. Its obvious you didnt. Not even arguing with your dumb ass anymore