Breh, I know that FB would realize the savings, I asking why they SHOULD realize the savings instead of the employee.
I understand COL, breh, it’s not a hard concept.
If, while living in Louisville I take a WFH job paying $60k, and my wife gets a job in NYC so we move our family to NYC I would
NOT expect my employer to increase my pay. I’d only expect them to give me a COL bump if they were requiring me to move to NYC.
You’re not paying them more because they decided to move, you’re paying them the same salary you agreed to when you hired them since they’re still doing the same work under the guidelines by which they can work. Before all this, if an employee chose to move from an expensive condo downtown to a suburban apartment for half the cost, FB wouldn’t care and it would have no effect on that employee’s pay. Makes sense, cuz it has no effect on the employee’s ability to do the job for which they were hired (actually it may have more of effect than the WFH scenario since the suburban home may require a longer commute which could affect productivity), but as long as the productivity remains the same FB wouldn’t care.