I guess what I'm trying to say is that playing "suffering metrics" with abuse victims is completely pointless, even more so as someone that literally has fukking clue what happened (in this case Henry and all of us that are commentating on his interview).
Even if somehow she had the time of her life doing this deviant shyt and getting pimped out to different people in the company (and that's a wild thing to assume anyways) because money was good, the fact is Vince did stop paying and stopped honoring the contract
Vince himself made them sign. So what's the point on trying to diminish whatever the victim felt or didn't feel? At the end of the day you end up caping for an abuser trying to say one victim "didn't have it that bad" or some shyt
Like I said, they whole point of abusing other people is taking advantage of someone that wont do nor say shyt about the abuser because they are going through something that makes them the perfect pray for whatever abuse they wanna do. Even if it's as simple as money. And again, the whole point here is that Vince stopped paying, so trying to start an argument about "she didn't have it that bad" is really assbackwards from my perspective.