Who asked you to?
then explain why you think broner is better than pacquiao?
Who asked you to?
Even though he's winning this fight, is it wrong for me to say that, as a first time Broner viewer, I'm not really that impressed with his work?
@ Broner being more skilled than
Yous stanly's better be voting for your boy to fight another dude who can't punch because if Matthysse or Maidana win that poll the judges can't save his ass from getting KTFO...
Broner's defense looked a lot better, Paulie landed absolutely nothing
they talking about 121 or some shyt jabs landing, but couldn't put together two clips in between rounds of him landing anything.
He hit nothing but shoulder and elbows, and grazed him at the best the entire fight.
Broner stalked him from the first round he was in complete control and paulie posed no threat, but however he did take an impressive ass whipping and he his more of a man than me because i was would've quit.
I said that Broner is more skilled than Pacquiao. He has a better jab, better ring generalship, better defense, and is more versatile. Pacquiao is basically a 1 handed 1 dimensional fighter, with sub par defense. Now you explain why you disagree.then explain why you think broner is better than pacquiao?
Broner is clearly more skilled than Pacquiao. You obviously don't know boxing.@ Broner being more skilled than
You stanly's better be voting for your boy to fight another dude who can't punch because if Matthysse or Maidana win that poll the judges can't save his ass from getting KTFO...
what..the...fukk...are you talking about? ..gotdamn you stay saying stupid shyt when it comes to boxing
He won round 1 imoGet off my dikk
anybody who thinks Paulie did anything but get beat down is a damn fool easily manipulated by the bias commentating who were clearly trying to save face for the colleague who was getting trounced.
Paulie did not win a single ROUND.
Broner was in control from the start of the fight pressuring and pushing the pace.
In between rounds they couldn't even muster replays of Paulie landing anything, he was hitting elbows and gloves the entire fight. He occasionaly got through a little jab which was more like a push then a punch.
Dude was getting beat down, his face was battered, HE HAD BRUISES ON HIS fukkING CHEST
He looked like an abuse step child after the fight what the fukk was you watching dawg.
Get off my dikk
anybody who thinks Paulie did anything but get beat down is a damn fool easily manipulated by the bias commentating who were clearly trying to save face for the colleague who was getting trounced.
Paulie did not win a single ROUND.
Broner was in control from the start of the fight pressuring and pushing the pace.
In between rounds they couldn't even muster replays of Paulie landing anything, he was hitting elbows and gloves the entire fight. He occasionaly got through a little jab which was more like a push then a punch.
Dude was getting beat down, his face was battered, HE HAD BRUISES ON HIS fukkING CHEST
He looked like an abuse step child after the fight what the fukk was you watching dawg.
Get off my dikk
anybody who thinks Paulie did anything but get beat down is a damn fool easily manipulated by the bias commentating who were clearly trying to save face for the colleague who was getting trounced.
Paulie did not win a single ROUND.
Broner was in control from the start of the fight pressuring and pushing the pace.
In between rounds they couldn't even muster replays of Paulie landing anything, he was hitting elbows and gloves the entire fight. He occasionaly got through a little jab which was more like a push then a punch.
Dude was getting beat down, his face was battered, HE HAD BRUISES ON HIS fukkING CHEST
He looked like an abuse step child after the fight what the fukk was you watching dawg.
sorry, I was scoring the bout as a professional would...you must have been using the amateur Olympic scoring system.
Paulie won the first 2 rounds clearly breh
nikkas still kicking this dumbshyt...Pacquiao is basically a 1 handed 1 dimensional fighter
I said that Broner is more skilled than Pacquiao. He has a better jab, better ring generalship, better defense, and is more versatile. Pacquiao is basically a 1 handed 1 dimensional fighter, with sub par defense. Now you explain why you disagree.Broner is clearly more skilled than Pacquiao. You obviously don't know boxing.