Mac Miller Slapped With SECOND 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit

[BlackDiBiase]

Mac should counter sue him for defamation of character, stress and lack of earnings the trail will cause him with this frivolous law suit.

producer just looking for some shine, mac is nice on the mic but 10 mill twice .... his probably somewhere crying looking at the skys.

 

[Carr]

Mac should counter sue him for defamation of character, stress and lack of earnings the trail will cause him with this frivolous law suit.

producer just looking for some shine, mac is nice on the mic but 10 mill twice .... his probably somewhere crying looking at the skys.

if they made the beat; they deserve the shine.

 

[OnlyInCalifornia]

I think its more so the history of not crediting producers; after the SOB's incident it now seems like Mac is intentionally not crediting people therefore producers now feel like they have been stolen from and are taking action.

Maybe but it has more to do with money and visibility than anything else. No one is suing Maino because wtf they going to sue him for? Young Berg's latest chain?

 

[BlackDiBiase]

if they made the beat; they deserve the shine.

true, but go worldstar or twitter or tell mac to tell em about who made the beat.

10 milly ? in the words of Fat Joe to Cuban Link 'there all gonna laugh at cha, there all gonna laugh at cha, hahhahhaha'

 

[Carr]

Maybe but it has more to do with money and visibility than anything else. No one is suing Maino because wtf they going to sue him for? Young Berg's latest chain?

Thats why many people get into this hip-hop game. Either to make a living off of something they love or greed; either or its still about money at the end of the day. And visability has strong ties to earning an income from hip-hop/music. If your work has paved the way for someone else to make a mil; u would at least want to be in the credits and its really fukked up that Mac couldn't even hop on Youtube & add produced by to the title in a timely manner, b4 the goons came knockin' .

 

[Danie84]

 

[Carr]

true, but go worldstar or twitter or tell mac to tell em about who made the beat.

10 milly ? in the words of Fat Joe to Cuban Link 'there all gonna laugh at cha, there all gonna laugh at cha, hahhahhaha'

I heard Finesse wanted the same credit as those producers...either way; as part creator/owner of a song you shouldnt have to go to such lengths to be credited for ur artistic contribution. A lot of a$$holes in this industry dont got the decency; and after countless times not being acknowledged or heard about YOUR OWN WORK; u woud want to take every damn penny u can get. Its messed up that it got so far, but damn 90% of time it dont got to get that far if the artist show respect.

 

[ZEB WALTON]

so he just slowed down that beat? did someone reproduce it?as in us eit as a sample? i mean... idk. 10 mil for that, theyre buggin. they should gert something but 10 mil? son straight took the LF song without credit, crediting samples on mixtapes now? shyts splittin hairs.theres no reason to not give credit tho. just lazy

 

[Hussein Fonzarelli]

aint no way that beat up video aint a stunt


why would someone beat somebody up? he prolly sold that shyt to 2chainz for bag of weed



the fukk......


sad shyt

 

[BlackDiBiase]

^ I see your point, but i dont think its ever disrespectful to use a producers beat because any real producer (artist) wants people to enjoy his works. So for Mac Miller to use the beat means he liked the beat.

I do see your points though, Carr and L&HH.

 

[Carr]

^ I see your point, but i dont think its ever disrespectful to use a producers beat because any real producer (artist) wants people to enjoy his works. So for Mac Miller to use the beat means he liked the beat.

I do see your points though, Carr and L&HH.

its not disrespectful to use the beat...but it is to disrespectful to when the producer reach out asking for written credit.

 

[Brock Landers]

Judge won't give him 10mil and they'll most likely settle out of court, the interesting thing is the precedent that it might set for future cases

 

[Mask and Da Glock]

take the fact that he's a jew and white out of the picture, pretend this is someone you can all feel comfortable backing and not clearly bias against...the mixtape, for a while now, has been a place for freestyles yeah but more importantly crazy ass beats with samples that could NEVER EVER CLEAR. So yeah, you want this "lil kyke culture vulture" to get it. Okay. Say goodbye to some of the best and most innovative beats ever made because up and coming producers can't pay X pop singer or X jazz group thousands and thousands.


BUT, the least he could do is put (produced by Lord Finesse) in the tags if there is any in the first place.

 

[Long Live The Kane]

Think these lawsuits are frivolous...but at least I can understand this coming from this guy more than Finesse...because at least this guy isn't hip hop...regardless if the suit works out for him or not, the publicity has already helped him...never heard of dude a day in my life, but I'm digging that song

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

this will be one of the biggest cases in music history... both of them...

a few years back a few artists sued because of samples. it USED to be, you could take any sample, as long as it was under 4 seconds long, and not have to pay for it. well after that case, don't matter if its .5 seconds, you have to pay. that changed beat making for the whole industry


now imagine if these two dudes win their cases.. that sets precedent.. which would now make it so you can't use other people's beats for ANYTHING.. even mixtapes or free shyt.. in other words, no more freestyles, unofficial remixes or anything like that. what 2 chains was talking about, hating other people remixing his song.. well he'd be able to actually sue people and win now. along with 99% of dat piff.

of course the person would actually have to sue. but i'm sure with the declining profits in record companies, they'd be sure to sue for their artists since they own the masters