I don't do back and forth too much, I don't have the patience. So this will probably be my only reply
It's nonsensical for a player to improve his defense after he was literally HUNTED on the defensive end? Forget the series for a second, what happened to wanting to be a complete player? But lets get back to the series, you know what happens if instead of giving up 30 points on defense you give up 15 or 20? That DECREASES the amount of points you have to score offensively. You see the correlation there?
The Celtics only averaged 101 points on 52 eFG% (the league-average was 55 eFG%).
Their best player played well below expectations on offense.
Not only did Boston struggle to have consistent offensive performances, but their efficiency was below league-average.
Given that, how much emphasis can be put on Luka's defense, or lack thereof, as reason for why the Mavs lost? Was that really the root of the Mavs' issues, or was it the fact that Luka's entire supporting cast didn't perform up to standard on offense? If you take away Game 4, the Mavs only averaged 93 points across the other four games, and yet y'all are putting Luka's defense under the microscope for being the reason why they ended up losing that series.
Marinate on that.
Maybe it's a disconnect in expectations. You see that guy in Avatar? That's the kind of player I expect. Work on your weaknesses, become the best player you can be. There is NO fukkING WAY that Bean has a recognizable weakness at the end of one season and comes back the same player the following year, NOOOOOO!!!!!
You can have the Dirk's and Luka's, I'll stick to the Kobe's and MJ's
Oh please, Kobe didn't need to defend shyt during the three-peat. He and Shaq were historically dominant offensively to the point that whatever they did (or didn't do) at the other end of the floor was inconsequential. They completely demoralized teams on offense, that it took all the life out of their opposition, limiting them from fighting back on the other end. Shaq treated defense with a lick and a promise back then and that didn't stop him from being the best player in the league and stacking up championships. You think he worked on defense and came back a better player on that end during that period?
What happened in the years after that when Kobe failed to go back to the Finals (until they landed Pau)? Where was that defense when Kobe couldn't even get out of the 1st round during that period? What if Kobe ended up in Charlotte, what championship success would his defense brought to that franchise?
That's the problem with y'all cats. You apply this comicbook hero logic to hoops instead of applying reality.