Look at the racist cac poster from the UK, OD-Mela, y'all!

[Remote]

Full post was here. Context - OD-Mela was denying Eurocentrism in Academia and claiming that Ancient Egyptians were not Black

 

[3rdWorld]

Anobody trying to claim ancient Kemet was white or Arab or multiracial must get a permanent banning.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Exactly..just as all Black Africans look today, varying shades of brown.

Some people are taught to believe all black peoples are homogeneous, despite the opposite being true.
His culture is all about created differences, like religious caste separation based on complexion.

 

[Remote]

@MansaMusa dropping some serious ether in here.

Good knowledge too

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Neg. 2017

 

[GetInTheTruck]

first off, I know the painting you speak of and it's a fake, google it. They almost always show themselves bronze, not various colours and some paintings, mostly the ones outdoors have eroded and changed colours, but the ones in the tombs ALWAYS show bronze.

There are lots of people in the world that are "bronze," or even darker than bronze who we don't consider to be "black." You want to call the Egyptians "black" because of locality, and I have no problem with that. They are certainly black within the modern social context. But they couldn't have been "black" in the academic sense because there's no room for that type of characterization within THAT context. Otherwise, why don't we create a new racial category called "bronze" and put the Egyptians in that category? Would this be acceptable?

strange, indians are indians or 'caucasian' but then when speaking of africans, you magically imply they are different people. indians come in different shades as do africans. you taking pride in all shades of indians is the same as black americans taking pride in the various shades of africa. but regardless, they still looked like horners, who we consider to be black. berbers are also black. everyone NATIVE to africa, consciously, is considered 'black'. the arabs that currently occupy egypt are not black, nor the same people.

Who is taking pride in what? You used the word Caucasian, not me. The same people who came up with that word also consider horners to be Caucasians, but I doubt you would agree with that classification, for obvious reasons. Pakistanis and Sri Lankans ARE different people, I never said they were the same...only that they are technically the same "race" in that they are both technically "South Asian." But there is a world of difference between them in terms of culture, values, language, diet, religious practice, etc; which is what really matters when it comes to ethnic identification. When we consider things from that standpoint, physical characteristics mean very little.

Some people are taught to believe all black peoples are homogeneous, despite the opposite being true.
His culture is all about created differences, like religious caste separation based on complexion.

All humans "create" ways to separate themselves from one another. Europeans by geography, Africans by tribes, Arabs by Clans, South Asians by caste....China is dominated by the Han ethnic group which pushed minority ethnic groups south, which is where you get the other types of Asians like Vietnamese, Thai, Burmese, etc; etc; this is what ALL humans do....and caste has nothing to do with complexion, that's been covered in other threads.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Y'all still do that. My group is mixed, there is no reason.
You keep talking about tone variance like there arent untouched black people lighter than admixed high caste hindus.

 

[richaveli83]

2017 and you still have people thinking ancient Egyptians weren't black.

 

[BlackManLiveFromLondon]

fukk Ancient Egypt

all civilizations matter

 

[Remote]

fukk Ancient Egypt

all civilizations matter

 

[Afrodroid]

Despite the obvious cac troll trying to deflect the facts, this topic could be moved to high learning.

Brehs pouring some knowledge here

 

[3rdWorld]

2017 and you still have people thinking ancient Egyptians weren't black.

Like what the hell were the snow monkeys doing all the way in Africa in the desert sun burning like vampires in the daylight

I know you whites think we're slow and brainless and easily duped but nah breh..

Just quit lying and stop trying to impose yourself on our history.

Cacs ran with a lie from the beginning and are now under pressure to keep it alive since they're too proud to admit they lied.
Worry about your vikings and Henry the ivxx and leave African shyt alone.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

There are lots of people in the world that are "bronze," or even darker than bronze who we don't consider to be "black." You want to call the Egyptians "black" because of locality, and I have no problem with that. They are certainly black within the modern social context. But they couldn't have been "black" in the academic sense because there's no room for that type of characterization within THAT context. Otherwise, why don't we create a new racial category called "bronze" and put the Egyptians in that category? Would this be acceptable?

There's also people in the world that are black, their are Sri Lankans that are darker than me, but you know what they are, and I'm sure to some extent you associate with them. You do not view them as white, black, you view them as south asian. The point of the matter is, africans view egpytians as black africans, because they were.

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

There are lots of people in the world that are "bronze," or even darker than bronze who we don't consider to be "black." You want to call the Egyptians "black" because of locality, and I have no problem with that. They are certainly black within the modern social context. But they couldn't have been "black" in the academic sense because there's no room for that type of characterization within THAT context. Otherwise, why don't we create a new racial category called "bronze" and put the Egyptians in that category? Would this be acceptable?



Who is taking pride in what? You used the word Caucasian, not me. The same people who came up with that word also consider horners to be Caucasians, but I doubt you would agree with that classification, for obvious reasons. Pakistanis and Sri Lankans ARE different people, I never said they were the same...only that they are technically the same "race" in that they are both technically "South Asian." But there is a world of difference between them in terms of culture, values, language, diet, religious practice, etc; which is what really matters when it comes to ethnic identification. When we consider things from that standpoint, physical characteristics mean very little.



All humans "create" ways to separate themselves from one another. Europeans by geography, Africans by tribes, Arabs by Clans, South Asians by caste....China is dominated by the Han ethnic group which pushed minority ethnic groups south, which is where you get the other types of Asians like Vietnamese, Thai, Burmese, etc; etc; this is what ALL humans do....and caste has nothing to do with complexion, that's been covered in other threads.

lol what is Black in the 'academic context'?

Eurocentric apologia y'all!

 

[Remote]

lol what is Black in the 'academic context'?

Eurocentric apologia y'all!

I want to know this too