Look at the racist cac poster from the UK, OD-Mela, y'all!

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,739
Reputation
6,540
Daps
78,716
To say the Egyptians weren't black, whatever "black" means, is either ignorant or with the malicious intent to hide truth.

It's unsurprising that Eurocentric historians have defaced many ancient Egyptian statues and redefined the black colour of the statues to symbolise "the fertility of the land rather than ethnicity" because to accept Egypt as the work of black Africans completely rocks the foundations of white supremacy. The whole study of Egyptology has a racial bias with people like Hawess and other bigots that want to eliminate Black African historical contributions.

Whites are supposed to have the "burden" to lead other civilisations and yet their ideologies which emulate Greece are stolen from ancient Egypt.

That's why you'll hear them try to distort the race of the moors or downplay the work of African civilisations.
 

The Odum of Ala Igbo

Hail Biafra!
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
17,969
Reputation
2,955
Daps
52,728
Reppin
The Republic of Biafra
To say the Egyptians weren't black, whatever "black" means, is either ignorant or with the malicious intent to hide truth.

It's unsurprising that Eurocentric historians have defaced many ancient Egyptian statues and redefined the black colour of the statues to symbolise "the fertility of the land rather than ethnicity" because to accept Egypt as the work of black Africans completely rocks the foundations of white supremacy.

Whites are supposed to have the "burden" to lead other civilisations and yet their ideologies which emulate Greece are stolen from ancient Egypt.

That's why you'll hear them try to distort the race of the moors or downplay the work of African civilisations.

Hegel said Africa is "no historical part of the world; it has no movement or development to exhibit." shyt is blatant.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,597
Reputation
-19,904
Daps
75,579
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
No one said that they would look like Congolese. Black people are not a monolith. I will show you various types of Black people. Unless you are a cac, you'd be able to see how they look unalike but ALL are Black people:

Dinka
f2d02c0a9f15704b5b5e398a4451ec3a.jpg


Igbo
455939488_10.jpg


Khoisan
14594330264_1bcd116c96_b.jpg


Tigray
0bde8f642c69cc86b330f2e8393a36b6.jpg


EXACTLY
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,739
Reputation
6,540
Daps
78,716
Hegel said Africa is "no historical part of the world; it has no movement or development to exhibit." shyt is blatant.


Ironically Germany is a place with no significant ancient history, the "Holy Roman Empire" which was neither holy, roman or an empire and their barbarian history :mjlol:
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-736
Daps
27,704
Reppin
Queens
I don't think someone who just denied Ancient Egypt was black should be calling anyone stupid. It would be like denying Roman Empire was white because later some turks occupy constantinople. As for east africans not being west africans, actually west africans come from east africans as do north africans. We are 2 tribes under the same race, even the mixed north. Mediterraneans have a lot of mixture and slavics aren't west european but I am pretty sure you call them all white. Surely you can see the hypocrisy not calling east africans black.

If you look at Egypt on a map you see it lies north of the tropic of cancer, and all the peoples who occupy countries that are north of the tropic of cancer are generally "lighter skinned." It's common sense. That doesn't mean there weren't dark Egyptians, obviously there were, but even they themselves represented themselves as being "lighter" than their southern counterparts. The most honest conclusion you could come to is that if you transplanted the Ancient Egyptians into the present day, a percentage would indeed be considered to be "black," and a percentage wouldn't, that is, according to a crude "eye test." I know that's blasphemy on here but it's the truth. Look at that Sudanese kid who built that clock that cacs thought was a bomb....when that happened people on here were arguing over whether or not he was black, most people said he looked like an Arab....just another reason why using the words "black" and "white" in a racial sense rather than a cultural one is stupid and disingenuous, especially when trying to cast labels on people who lived thousands of years ago.
 

ChatGPT-5

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
18,103
Reputation
2,949
Daps
57,206
If you look at Egypt on a map you see it lies north of the tropic of cancer, and all the peoples who occupy countries that are north of the tropic of cancer are generally "lighter skinned." It's common sense. That doesn't mean there weren't dark Egyptians, obviously there were, but even they themselves represented themselves as being "lighter" than their southern counterparts. The most honest conclusion you could come to is that if you transplanted the Ancient Egyptians into the present day, a percentage would indeed be considered to be "black," and a percentage wouldn't, that is, according to a crude "eye test." I know that's blasphemy on here but it's the truth. Look at that Sudanese kid who built that clock that cacs thought was a bomb....when that happened people on here were arguing over whether or not he was black, most people said he looked like an Arab....just another reason why using the words "black" and "white" in a racial sense rather than a cultural one is stupid and disingenuous, especially when trying to cast labels on people who lived thousands of years ago.
5,000 years ago the environment was much different and the place was not desert in fact it was tropical. Arab invaders had not yet arrived. The people of egypt looked just like the rest of the horn. Just like india prior to it's north invading caucasian neighbours.. :usure:

edit: I should also add, that horners, unlike west africans, have recessive genes. This is why the region literally morphed over night after the arabs who deal with desert weather better, moved in.
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/a-half-somali-and-half-white-person-rare-pokemon.499512

it's also why Nubia aka Sudan, home of the black race, goes from almost midnight black to looking arab without any gradual change.
 
Last edited:

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
44,427
Reputation
3,813
Daps
130,203
To say the Egyptians weren't black, whatever "black" means, is either ignorant or with the malicious intent to hide truth.

It's unsurprising that Eurocentric historians have defaced many ancient Egyptian statues and redefined the black colour of the statues to symbolise "the fertility of the land rather than ethnicity" because to accept Egypt as the work of black Africans completely rocks the foundations of white supremacy. The whole study of Egyptology has a racial bias with people like Hawess and other bigots that want to eliminate Black African historical contributions.

Whites are supposed to have the "burden" to lead other civilisations and yet their ideologies which emulate Greece are stolen from ancient Egypt.

That's why you'll hear them try to distort the race of the moors or downplay the work of African civilisations.

True..
The Bible and Christianity are tied to Africa, namely Ethiopia and Egypt hence their desperation to assign them as white.
Accept that Egypt is Black then it puts cacs hold on the Bible in serious jeopardy.

If Europeans wanted pyramids etc so bad they should have built them in Europe and not a Black guys backyard. no one build structures on other people's land. that is Black people's work whether you like it or not.
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-736
Daps
27,704
Reppin
Queens
5,000 years ago the environment was much different and the place was not desert in fact it was tropical. Arab invaders had not yet arrived. The people of egypt looked just like the rest of the horn. Just like india prior to it's north invading caucasian neighbours.. :usure:

The Egyptians depicted themselves in varying shades of brown from light to darker. Some of them did indeed look like what we in the west would consider "black," but some don't. Saying that they were black in the generalized social sense is fine, but to label them "black" in the academic sense isn't because the word has no bearing in that domain.

and India never saw an invasion from the north, that's according to modern genetics. Regardless, everyone in the subcontinent, from the darkest southerner to the lightest northerner is technically considered to be "caucasian" according to that type of racial classification. So there's no racial difference between a light skinned Pakistani and a dark skinned Sri Lankan. Further proof that skin color is nothing more than a modern obsession.

There is ultimately no "black race" just like there is no "white race," or "yellow race."
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,565
Daps
90,297
Reppin
NO
:dwillhuh:Egypt always piss cacs off for some reason. Whats really in Egypt they want to claim so hard..I swear they hiding something big...
They are mad that the greatest technological achievement of all-time was built by negros and cannot and has not ever been replicated by crackers. THEY could have been ANYTHING but black, but since since they were, the devils tried so hard to take Egypt out of Africa or make them nonblack.
 

ChatGPT-5

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
18,103
Reputation
2,949
Daps
57,206
The Egyptians depicted themselves in varying shades of brown from light to darker. Some of them did indeed look like what we in the west would consider "black," but some don't. Saying that they were black in the generalized social sense is fine, but to label them "black" in the academic sense isn't because the word has no bearing in that domain.

and India never saw an invasion from the north, that's according to modern genetics. Regardless, everyone in the subcontinent, from the darkest southerner to the lightest northerner is technically considered to be "caucasian" according to that type of racial classification. So there's no racial difference between a light skinned Pakistani and a dark skinned Sri Lankan. Further proof that skin color is nothing more than a modern obsession.

There is ultimately no "black race" just like there is no "white race," or "yellow race."
first off, I know the painting you speak of and it's a fake, google it. They almost always show themselves bronze, not various colours and some paintings, mostly the ones outdoors have eroded and changed colours, but the ones in the tombs ALWAYS show bronze.

strange, indians are indians or 'caucasian' but then when speaking of africans, you magically imply they are different people. indians come in different shades as do africans. you taking pride in all shades of indians is the same as black americans taking pride in the various shades of africa. but regardless, they still looked like horners, who we consider to be black. berbers are also black. everyone NATIVE to africa, consciously, is considered 'black'. the arabs that currently occupy egypt are not black, nor the same people.
 
Top