Lonzo Ball will undergo a third surgery on his left knee that is expected to cost him most, if not all, of the 2023-24 season

[Eastside Get The Money]

These NBA nikkaz are worth $100M SAS gonna play with the wrong one 1 day and get deleted off this life

 

[Don Homer]

Who care if he can sit down? He apparently cant stand up, run, jump and change directions. Which is all kinda important in basketball.

No one is arguing that. He’s clearly not healthy. Lonzo never said he was.

SAS lied and said he can’t get in and out of a chair. Lonzo posted a video showing he can in fact get in and out of a chair no problem.

Stephen A proceeds to move the goalpost and create a strawman saying that doesn’t matter because Lonzo isn’t healthy enough to play ball (AGAIN, NO ONE SAID HE WAS HEALTHY ENOUGH TO PLAY BALL)


People are just calling out Stephen A for doubling down on being a goofy ass nikka who is misrepresenting players and flat out lying

 

[nieman]

Being a journalist (in this day and age...really any age), means that you report the information as factual as it is at the time that you receive it. For all purposes, Stephen A breaks the news as he receives it, based on his credible sources. However, credible sources can also have biases in the information they provide, but they are credible for a reason. With Stephen A, he can go directly to the party to get the true story (or story that is being compiled as the narrative by said party). He's very much connected and established. But overall, he nor other journalists really have to retract anything, which is why they have their reliable sources to provide the info at that time.

 

[GoldenGlove]

 

[Robert California]

Lonzo probably walked off camera like:

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

Being a journalist (in this day and age...really any age), means that you report the information as factual as it is at the time that you receive it. For all purposes, Stephen A breaks the news as he receives it, based on his credible sources. However, credible sources can also have biases in the information they provide, but they are credible for a reason. With Stephen A, he can go directly to the party to get the true story (or story that is being compiled as the narrative by said party). He's very much connected and established. But overall, he nor other journalists really have to retract anything, which is why they have their reliable sources to provide the info at that time.

That's a cop out ass excuse. SAS got it wrong and then threw a temper tantrum when called out on it like he always does.

 

[ReggieFlare]

SAS is blowing this situation way outta proportion…he’s feeling attacked but the shyt ain’t that serious for him to be doubling down on. Even Lonzo approached this whole thing lightheartedly

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Wow

 

[MarcP]

So doctors are disclosing Lonzo's health information? SASsy trying to get nikkas jammed up.

 

[lightskin jermaine]

Wow

If true, I'm suing the doctors expeditiously. SAS just won't accept an L

 

[Everythingg]

If true, I'm suing the doctors expeditiously. SAS just won't accept an L

That should be Zo’s next move which would be a checkmate. Call SAS out for going on his podcast and telling the public doctors committed a HIPPA violation by giving him someone else’s medical info

 

[Bryan Danielson]

So doctors are disclosing Lonzo's health information? SASsy trying to get nikkas jammed up.

If true, I'm suing the doctors expeditiously. SAS just won't accept an L

That should be Zo’s next move which would be a checkmate. Call SAS out for going on his podcast and telling the public doctors committed a HIPPA violation by giving him someone else’s medical info

Yea Zo needs to sue and Lamar need to go DefCom 3 on the Je….. er….. I mea, SAS

 

[iamduval]

Y’all gotta watch the video. He didn’t say the doctors were his sources. He said he knows who the doctors were and when the procedure was done which is pretty much reported by the team anyway

I guess it gets sketchy with the goofy threats he made toward the end but no violations

 

[The God Poster]

Being a journalist (in this day and age...really any age), means that you report the information as factual as it is at the time that you receive it. For all purposes, Stephen A breaks the news as he receives it, based on his credible sources. However, credible sources can also have biases in the information they provide, but they are credible for a reason. With Stephen A, he can go directly to the party to get the true story (or story that is being compiled as the narrative by said party). He's very much connected and established. But overall, he nor other journalists really have to retract anything, which is why they have their reliable sources to provide the info at that time.

Retracting does not = doubling down

 

[Gritsngravy]

Did he ever address stefon diggs calling him out?