So the law was written poorly? Cuz that should have been obvious to law makers.
This is why we're against "race- based" reparations, for all the pannies.
Full text of bill
In 2002, the City Council supported US House Resolution 40 (HR-40), calling for a Federal Commission to study slavery and its vestiges, and make recommendations for reparations, with the adoption of Resolution 43-R-02, “Slave Reparations.” In November 2019, the Evanston City Council adopted Resolution 126-R-19, “Establishing the City of Evanston Reparations Fund and the Reparations Subcommittee.” The resolution committed the first ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) of the City’s Municipal Cannabis Retailers’ Occupation Tax (3% on gross sales of cannabis) to fund local reparations for housing and economic development programs for Black Evanston residents. In passing Resolution 58-R-19, “Commitment to End Structural Racism and Achieve Racial Equity,” the City of Evanston government recognizes the government allowed and perpetuated racial disparities through the use of many regulatory and policyoriented tools. The Restorative Housing Program ("The Program"), the first Program of the Evanston Local Reparations Fund, acknowledges the harm caused to Black/African-American Evanston residents due to discriminatory housing policies and practices and inaction on the City's part. The Program outlined in this document is a step towards:
● Revitalize, preserve, and stabilize Black/African-American owner-occupied homes in Evanston;
● Increase homeownership and build the wealth of Black/African-American residents;
● Build intergenerational equity amongst Black/African-American residents; and
● Improve the retention rate of Black/African-American homeowners in the City of Evanston.
1. Ancestor: African American or Black resident of the City between 1919 and 1969 who may have children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, or other issue defined as a “
Direct Descendant.”
2. Applicant: Black or African-American person seeking compensation based on the criteria outlined in this guideline.
3.
Black or African-American:A person having origins in any of Africa’s black racial and ethnic groups.
Everything including the actual reparations webpage mention ONLY decendants. The text in the bill itself merely defined who was wronged and who is eligible, and that 3rd point clearly leaves a bit of leeway e.g. "I had a black grandmother" said by someone who 100% passes as white.
Mind you, this is the 2nd time this same group attacked this law, and this is the first one of it's kind in the nation. It's way too soon to call it a poorly written law when white supremacists are gonna come at it any way they can.
From Judicial Watch's website:
Judicial Watch states in the lawsuit: “At no point in the application process are persons in the first and second groups required to present evidence that they or their ancestors experienced housing discrimination or otherwise suffered harm because of an unlawful Evanston ordinance, policy, or procedure or some other unlawful act or series of acts by Evanston between 1919 and 1969. In effect, Evanston is using race as a proxy for having experienced discrimination during this time period.”
This is there claim, and they have to prove it. Its claiming that they are not proving they were affected and that the 6 people they represent would qualify as well, basically backdooring non-blacks into reparations at large. Its like asking for notarized letters saying "You are black therefore you can not etc etc etc" rather than acknowledging the time period and the laws in place, which means ANY attempt at reparations can be "technically we don't know if that really happened" no matter how you word it. There is literally a city council session for Reparations tomorrow so I am sure this will come up and this law survived the first challenge. I won't fault a lamb for how a wolf repeatedly attacks it.