People revise history everyday on here talking about the Attitude Era was shytty.
I remember only
@Cobratron used to shyt on it, now a lot of people want to say it was "never that good." And then turn on TV and watch the drizzling shyt that is presented as programming week after week.
Thing is though, I'm not revising history. Just calling a spade a spade. There was a lot to love in those eras. What's to love now? Without
forcing it because of "fukkery." Perfect example would be the Rusev love triangle storyline; horrible, top to bottom. GOATsso wouldn't even have it on his blooper reel in 1998/99. Yet for a couple of weeks people were trying to act like that BS was interesting television. Nah.
And let's keep it 100 about the Fiend, they fukked that up when they started having Funhouse Bray act more overtly heelish. There's no real backstory to the character and no real storyline or progression of the character. He changes people? How? Why? Are there any residual effects beyond their initial turn? Why does Bray target children? Really the Fiend losing is no big loss, he was just going to fizzle out anyway because he's not developed nor is he developing.
This is the WOAT era for WWE. Everything sans NXT is a swing and a miss. It has to he purposeful. Even when they stumble into something hot, like Erick Rowan, recovering that botched Reigns storyline and running it in for a touchdown, they completely shyt on their own fortune by not following up on the win over Reigns and this stupid cage storyline which is culminating in back to back losses to fresh out of the closet Aleister Black. To quote a TSC heel we love to hate; "stupid, stupid!"
Looking back objectively the Reign of Terror and InCenarator eras were average to pretty good television. The highs averaged out the lows. In fact the HHH reign of terror and the Ruthless Agression era are the same thing; they start and end around the same time; 2002-2006 and you all LOVE the RA era.
So yeah RoT-RA era and Cena Era >>>>>>>>> Post Cena Bullshyt Era.