These cacs on CNN are
Yeah. Talking about "Where are the facts?!" "There's still reasonable doubt".
There will ALWAYS be reasonable doubt in this case, as long as we go by the standard that you can defend your self from "littering" and the absurd idea that you can have self-defense from anything as long as you internally "feel" it.
GZ got the most ideal case possible. He is the hunter and Trayvon is the lion and the lion's story is never told. They don't understand that the whole point here is to show that the story of the hunter can't be trusted.
I would not be surprised to see a not guilty verdict, but its def manslaughter here.