Libertarians, do you think asteroids should be left to the free market?

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,329
Reputation
5,864
Daps
93,997
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
I can't believe people are seriously arguing that we should leave asteroid detection to the free market. :deadmanny:



Best idea I've heard is to use something to nudge it out of the collision course.

If we knew decades in advance that an asteroid was headed for earth, we could maybe attach a spacecraft to it and push it until it changed orbit. Or maybe landing a spacecraft onto the asteroid, drilling into it, and ejecting material from it (thus reducing it's mass and changing its orbit). Of course that kind of stuff would only work if we had lots of advance notice. If we didn't then we'd have to nuke it and hope for the best.

Bruce Willis? :russ::russ::russ::russ::russ::russ:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,969
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,060
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
:patrice: If there would be no market incentive? Why make laws preventing the market from exploring it?...
Seems like a waste of time, energy, and tax money, unless...:mjpls:
 
Last edited:

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,746
:heh: at the 1%ers rushing to fill our problems in light of a catastrophe.... You gotta be stupid to really believe that.

These dudes would probably rather create shelters for themselves, launch themselves out in space in time to miss the blast, and then land after everyone was :dead:
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,426
Reputation
3,888
Daps
107,848
Reppin
Detroit
I remember this thread :russ:

Risk the extinction of the human race because of your political ideology, brehs


Edit: That was funny until I realized that's actually happening w/climate change. I just depressed myself. :to:
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,150
Daps
32,531
Reppin
852
:stopitslime: If there indeed was a civilization ending asteroid hurtling towards us we would blow it up to smithereens, fukk all that shyt about accepting some imaginary character's will :fohmayne:

you just gonna accept the end of humanity because of some book some crusty illiterate goat fukker herder wrote :cubewtfmayne:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,731
Daps
203,942
Reppin
the ether
SINCE I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO CONVERT EACH OTHER TO DIFFERENT ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHIES, I'D LIKE TO SEE SOME TECHNICAL IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO DEFLECT OR AVOID AN INCOMING KILLER ASTEROID, BROTHER!

YOU CAN'T JUST NUKE THEM SINCE THEY'LL BREAK INTO MILLIONS OF SHARDS AND BOMBARD THE PLANET, DUDE!

Lots of pieces still better than one, because they would burn up more in the atmosphere and be slowed down more by air resistance. I'd much rather have it come down in a thousands parts than as one big killer bomb.

I think, though, that the point of a nuke would be more to blow up one side and therefore deflect the asteroid's course than to blow it into little pieces.




405lb deadlift is meh...:childplease:

405lb squat would have me:sadbron:

Man, when I was 18 I was up to 375lb squat before I blew out my knee. :mjcry:


Was repping 445lb on dead lift too....but I did pull a muscle in my lower back doing that, so maybe that was stupid.
 
Top