http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFLUJpQPHaQ>>>>>>>> point lookout
Yeah I did play on ps3 and I agree on the story being more epic in fo3 but I don't think New Vegas story sucked, I just put the setting over story on these type of gamesYou played it on the PS3? That explains it then.
New Vegas was broken on every platform, but the PC community got around it in different ways. I got glitched about 5 hours in and did not have a save for a while. Game just didn't grab me like FO3 did, FO3 was EPIC and felt like you were all alone trying to save the world (until the end)
I actually think the story sucked in NV
Maybe it's cause I grew up in DC and seeing places I know all fukked up had me like
But seriously, the way FO3 brought you up from birth, to leaving the vault, to finding your father at the end and what happened with that stuck with me more than the story of the Courier.
are nikkas seriously saying that NV is better than FO3?
I think I spent 180 hours on F03 and about 20 hours tops on NV
shyt was a waste of time, the game was boring, the setting was wack, the side quests sucked
You are not alone. FO3 is just a better overall game up and down...notice how its the old loyal fallout heads who hold NV in higher regard than FO3 because its a "real fallout game"this too
the urban setting in FO3 was waaaay more interesting
if found myself bored to death at times and the VATS system seemed a bit off in NV
mr house and caesar story>>>>> that water shyt and the flabby and sick brotherhood of steelHardcore mode was the only thing that made NV interesting. The story was so boring.
mr house and caesar story>>>>> that water shyt and the flabby and sick brotherhood of steel
People really going to act like Ulysses wasn't that dude along with Joshua Graham da gawd.
I did enjoy DC more than Nevada though withe subways and whatnot.