YUP .. KOBE WAS THE REAL FIRST OPTION. THERE U GO PROVING MY POINT.. HE HAD THE HIGHEST USAGE RATE ON A TEAM THAT THREEPEATED. BUT SHAQ HAD SENIORITY, THUS IT WAS "HIS TEAM", WHICH IS LARGELY TO BLAME FOR THE ILLUSION THAT HE WAS THE BEST PLAYER WHEN ANYONE WHO SAW THE HARD FOUGHT SERIES' VS THE SPURS, KINGS, BLAZERS KNOWS IT WAS KOBE RUNNING THE SHOW .. SHAQ GENERALLY FEASTED ON THE MUCH WEAKER EAST, WHICH WON HIM THE FINALS MVP', HENCE THE FALSE NARRATIVE THAT "KOBE WAS CARRIED" .. SENIORITY
Nope, Shaq was just far better and more effective with the ball in his hands. There's no metric that possibly says Kobe was better than Shaq when they played together.
Accolades: Shaq
Regular season performance: Shaq
Playoff performance: Shaq
Traditional stats: Shaq
Advanced stats: Shaq