Lebron James just dropped 56 points

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,088
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Skinny unathletic soccer player Nash won more MVPs than “greatest player of all time” Kobe during Kobe’s prime. Address that without deflecting to Lebron…


U LITERALLY JUST DEFLECTED AND TOTALLY IGNORED WHAT I SAID BECAUSE IT SHIITS ALL OVER YOUR POINT

:mjlol:
 

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,861
Reputation
13,960
Daps
325,712
47% FG, 45% FG, 44% FG, 44% FG​

One of these players is the GOAT shooter, one is a "chucker", one is the previous GOAT shooter and the last one has never been called a chucker despite shooting the same percentage.

These conversations have always been biased nonsense from bitter Bron stans. If you get 90% of your shots right next to the basket, you better have a higher field goal percentage. And in today's league, many players are obsessively monitoring their FG%. Are those guys better than Kobe? Hell no. If you're purposely checking your stats, seeing you're at 50% for the night, then choosing to only shoot layups and dunks for the rest of the night, that doesn't make you a better player. Nikkas were not obsessing over their percentages like that in 2005. T-Mac, Kobe, Pierce, Carter and Iverson could have easily did that. Also, upon researching this, most shooting guards don't shoot 50% consistently. They may have a few seasons but, its rare. They are all mostly in that 44% to 47% range. But of course, only one player is disparaged for this :troll:
This may be one of the dumest basketball related posts I've ever seen.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,841
Reppin
the ether
47% FG, 45% FG, 44% FG, 44% FG​

One of these players is the GOAT shooter, one is a "chucker", one is the previous GOAT shooter and the last one has never been called a chucker despite shooting the same percentage.

These conversations have always been biased nonsense from bitter Bron stans.

It's fukking 2022, if haven't figured out that a ton more 3pt shots seriously affects FG%'s then you really shouldn't participate in adult conversations about basketball.

That first guy at 47% FG makes almost 4 threes/game and is shooting 58% eFG
That second guy at 45% FG makes 1.4 threes/game and is shooting 48% eFG

That is a MASSIVE difference, but somehow that's just "biased nonsense" to say 58% eFG is better than 48%?

I'm totally clueless who #3 is because neither Ray Allen nor Reggie Miller shot 44% for their career.



The rest of your post is rambling nonsense. If you're a close-to-the rim player who relies on other players to feed him, then of course you should shoot a higher %. You're only making 2pt shots and it requires the work of other players to get you the ball in position. But two perimeter players who create their own shots, shoot the same # of threes, and share the same responsibilities in the offense should be held to the same standards. If one of those guys has the skills to get close to the basket more often and create a higher-% shot, and the other guy can't or won't do it and is settling for lower-% shots and not scoring as much as a result, then the first guy is a better scorer. Full stop.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,088
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Flip Murray and Drew Gooden aren't carrying the Cavs to a title no matter how many "stats Bron sacrifices". That's why your argument is stupid as fukk.





Wait, are you saying that regular season output is meaningless and you need a balanced squad to win? :ohhh:

I guess Kobe's 35ppg season and 81point game were meaningless too. Breh, you just invalidated 90% of Kobestans arguments for him. :russ:

Take out meaningless regular season games and Kobe Bryant is just Dwayne Wade with more seasons next to Shaq. :lolbron:


AND THIS IS WHY ONLY BRON APOLOGISTS TAKE U SERIOUS ON THIS FORUM

DUDE NAMED FLIP MURRAY N DREW GOODEN INSTEAD OF THE ALL-STARS ON THEM SQUADS LMAO

NEVER CHANGE
 

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,861
Reputation
13,960
Daps
325,712
Thats not an argument. That’s your dumb ass opinion. And you cant spell “dumbest”. Imagine critiquing an essay in school with two sentences.

FOH.
Yeah I typed too fast and forgot the b in dumbest but I'll still say that post was the dumbest I seen in a minute. Like come on man. That shyt was equivalent to women saying they only like the Superbowl for the halftime show. :russ:
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,088
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Amazing that Bron somehow protects his FG% and still scores 3,000 more points than Kobe in the same # of games.




LeBron was 20 when the '05-'06 season started. It was just his 3rd season in the league and yet he averaged 31.4ppg on 50% shooting and took the champ Pistons to 7 in the ECSF despite Iglauskas putting up 10ppg as his #2 option.

What did Kobe do in his 3rd season? 19.9ppg on 46.7% shooting? 26.7% from 3pt (goddamn that's bad). Didn't even have to be the main guy and still got swept by 2nd-year Tim Duncan in the WCSF while averaging just 21ppg on 44% shooting?



UR EITHER PLAYIN DUMB OR PLAIN DUMB

I THINK ITS A COMBINATION OF BOTH

LEBRON TAKES ON THE EASY SHOTS WHILE PUTTING THE TOUGH SHOTS ON HIS TEAMMATES

KOBE TAKES ON THE TOUGH SHOTS WHILE GIVING THE EASY SHOTS TO HIS TEAMMATES

THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PLAYER WHO ADJUSTS THEIR GAME TO THEIR SURROUNDINGS AND A PLAYER WHO MAKES OTHERS ADJUST THEIR GAME TO THEM

EXAMPLE- IF LEBRON PREFERS AN OPEN LANE TO THE BASKET, HE WILL MAKE SURE A PLAYER LIKE LOVE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE PAINT TO KEEP THE LANES OPEN + DEFENSE OUT THE PAINT, DESPITE KEVIN LOVE BEIN IN HIS COMFORT ZONE DOWN LOW .. IN TURN, LEBRON WILL GET EASIER LOOKS, HIGHER PERCENTAGE SHOTS, BUT HIS TEAMMATES AND ULTIMATELY HIS TEAM WILL SUFFER FOR IT

ON THE CONTRARY, IF KOBE PREFERS AN OPEN LANE, HE WILL SACRIFICE THAT OPEN LANE IF HE KNOWS A PLAYER LIKE PAU OPERATES BEST IN THE PAINT.. KOBE WAS ABOUT WINNING FIRST, PERSONAL STATURE SECOND. HE UNDERSTOOD THAT WIT THIS METHOD, HIS STATS AND PERCENTAGES WOULD SUFFER, BUT HIS TEAM WOULD FIND MORE SUCCESS.

NOW, I KNOW A SOULLESS INDIVIDUAL SUCH AS YASELF WILL HAVE TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THAT, SINCE U FIND IT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THINGS WHICH CANT BE QUANTIFIED.. BUT HOPEFULLY OTHERS WHO HAVE THE CAPACITY FOR IT AND READ THIS WILL.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,841
Reppin
the ether
AND THIS IS WHY ONLY BRON APOLOGISTS TAKE U SERIOUS ON THIS FORUM

DUDE NAMED FLIP MURRAY N DREW GOODEN INSTEAD OF THE ALL-STARS ON THEM SQUADS LMAO

NEVER CHANGE

What do you mean "all stars on those squads"? LeBron's top-scoring season that we were discussing was 2006. There was no all-star on that squad besides LeBron. The top four guys on that 2006 team were Flip, Hughes, Z, and Gooden, and Hughes/Z were both injured most of the year and couldn't do any more. So who were they supposed to rely on?


Larry Hughes was supposed to be the #2 guy but he got hand surgery 1/3 of the way through the season and missed the next 3+ months, couldn't shoot for shyt when he came back.

Cavs' Hughes has finger surgery, out 8 weeks


Zydrunas had knee problems from the beginning of the season, only played 29 minutes/game for the year cause his knee couldn't take any more from wear and tear.

Cavs' Ilgauskas sidelined with knee




Bron's 2nd-highest scoring season was 2008, exact same shyt. There were no fukking all-stars on that squad, Hughes was still injured all year and Z was still washed and playing 20-something minutes a game. Who was Bron supposed to defer to, Drew Gooden and Delonte West?



You literally made up this "all-stars on the squad" bullshyt. The years Bron was scoring 30+ppg were because he HAD to do it. No one else on those fukking teams was going to do any more than Bron already had them doing.
 
Top