Goat poster
KANG LIFE
So Coli posters are teaching me that scheming and X and O's in basketball are irrelevant to winning
So Coli posters are teaching me that scheming and X and O's in basketball are irrelevant to winning
I don't want anyone to take what I said as coaching doesn't matter at all. It definitely does and San Antonio was playing beautiful basketball in their last two Finals. Pop adjusted and that entire team had a hive mind; everybody was on the same page.Meh not always true. In 2014 I don't know anybody who would say Tony Timmy and Manu at that point of their careers were individually better than Lebron, Wade, and Bosh at that point of their careers. But outside of maybe a quarter and a half out of 5 games the Spurs smoked the heat in record fashion in the finals. Primarily because Pop's X's and O's game was on point and Spo wasn't that level of coach yet.
Same thing when they beat Houston at home. Pop had just figured out O Antoni offense from top to bottom and from the second half of game 5 all through game 6 he just choked the life out of Houston and beat them in embarrassing fashion.
That Spurs Houston series is a perfect example of just how important X's and O's are. The spurs don't have Tony Parker, they don't have their mvp candidate Kawhi Leonard, but because Pop had checkmated O Antoni offense he was able to close them out, while they had an MVP candidate in James Harden...with Dejounte Murray and Johnathan fukking Simmons.
This thread gettin nasty. I’m a Lebron fan, but please stop with this shyt. Dude is right, it was all mental that series was not about X’s and O’s
Lebron averaged 17 a game vs/ Dallas
That is mind boggling. To put that in perspective his next lowest series average before or after was 22 a game when he was a pup with no J vs San Antonio
And what really hammers home the mental part is he shot 35% vs SA. Their defense was stifling. But against Dallas he shot 47%. 17 on 47%?? So that tells you it wasn’t even their defense, he was not shooting; it was mental.
I don't want anyone to take what I said as coaching doesn't matter at all. It definitely does and San Antonio was playing beautiful basketball in their last two Finals. Pop adjusted and that entire team had a hive mind; everybody was on the same page.
San Antonio was more talented overall. Tony Parker was Second Team All-NBA; Duncan received more All-NBA votes than Wade or Bosh. Wade wasn't the same physically as he was two years prior. LeBron was LeBron but those other two weren't the same at that point. That's the unspoken reason why he bolted to go back to Cleveland. He knew it was over for that group.
Ray, Shane and Rashard retired right after that series. San Antonio's supporting cast was MUCH better. This can't even be debated.This is partly true, but again, I think people are seeing the scheming and assuming its all talent.
Is 38yo limping Duncan still making 3rd-team All-NBA in 2015 without brilliant scheming?
Is Tony Parker really a 2nd-team All-NBA level talent over guys like Dame, Wall, Westbrook, Kyrie, Wade, Lowry, and Conley without playing in a superior system?
Is a young Kawhi who just 3 years earlier was averaging 14ppg for San Diego State going to be a Finals MVP without Pop's coaching?
Does a supporting cast of 36yo Manu, Patty Mills, Danny Green, Boris Diaw, and Tiago Splitter badly outplay a supporting cast of 38yo Ray, 34yo Rashard, Chalmers, Cole, and Birdman just because they're more talented, or because the schemes fit their skill sets better than Miami's schemes fit their cast?
Some people in this thread are saying, "It's always raw skill!" because the physical aspect of players playing is the only thing on the court they can see. They can't see the decisions made in the players' heads, they can't see the systems drawn up by the coaching staff, they can't see the preparation that goes into the game before gameday even starts. So the natural human instinct is solely to attribute the wins to the visible, physical motions of the players. But there's way more going on than just that.
How many 60 plus year olds have a podcast?Imagine a nikka doing a PODCAST, being considered a GOAT!
WOULD NEVER.
Looks like I found this page archived in the wayback machine.
He has the look about him where he one of the ones that says the slurs if you make him mad enough. Also looks like a tiki torcherLooks like I found this page archived in the wayback machine.
This is partly true, but again, I think people are seeing the scheming and assuming its all talent.
Is 38yo limping Duncan still making 3rd-team All-NBA in 2015 without brilliant scheming?
Is Tony Parker really a 2nd-team All-NBA level talent over guys like Dame, Wall, Westbrook, Kyrie, Wade, Lowry, and Conley without playing in a superior system?
Is a young Kawhi who just 3 years earlier was averaging 14ppg for San Diego State going to be a Finals MVP without Pop's coaching?
Does a supporting cast of 36yo Manu, Patty Mills, Danny Green, Boris Diaw, and Tiago Splitter badly outplay a supporting cast of 38yo Ray, 34yo Rashard, Chalmers, Cole, and Birdman just because they're more talented, or because the schemes fit their skill sets better than Miami's schemes fit their cast?
Some people in this thread are saying, "It's always raw skill!" because the physical aspect of players playing is the only thing on the court they can see. They can't see the decisions made in the players' heads, they can't see the systems drawn up by the coaching staff, they can't see the preparation that goes into the game before gameday even starts. So the natural human instinct is solely to attribute the wins to the visible, physical motions of the players. But there's way more going on than just that.
I gotta agree with regular p for 2014 in the finals. The Heat’s supporting cast was absolutely cooked at that point. The role players hadn’t been particularly good that year all season, which shouldn’t have been a shock considering their age. They were running the same offense they had the year before, but the role players simply hit the wall on top of Wade’s sharp decline from the end of the 2013 27 game win streak up through the 2014 playoffs. Everyone’s 3 point shooting declined (literally every player on the team who was shooting 3’s in 2012-13), they weren’t getting out on the break as much, and they simply didn’t have that extra gear they did the year before. It was especially noticeable on defense. They dropped off by 12 games from the year before with the same coaching staff. Battier, Haslem, & Rashard Lewis all played themselves in and out of the rotation, Allen got real streaky shooting the ball (25% from deep in January 2014), the birdman wasn’t quite as good as the year before, Norris Cole simply couldn’t shoot from anywhere on the court, and they ended up missing Mike Miller more than they expected to. While I don’t think Spo had a good finals, I don’t think any sort of scheming could’ve gotten them past the spurs with how they were playing.Ray, Shane and Rashard retired right after that series. San Antonio's supporting cast was MUCH better. This can't even be debated.
I said coaching matters but talent generally wins out at the end of the day. I'm at the point where I think bad coaching has a greater effect than good coaching. There's a baseline of competence and when coaches fall under that bar (like Darvin Ham), I think it causes more harm than good coaching benefits a team, if that makes sense.
This thread gettin nasty. I’m a Lebron fan, but please stop with this shyt. Dude is right, it was all mental that series was not about X’s and O’s
Lebron averaged 17 a game vs Dallas
That is mind boggling. To put that in perspective his next lowest series average before or after was 22 a game when he was a pup with no J vs San Antonio
And what really hammers home the mental part is he shot 35% vs SA. Their defense was stifling. But against Dallas he shot 47%. 17 on 47%?? So that tells you it wasn’t even their defense, he was not shooting; it was mental.
And why that’s relevant it shows yall on some tryhard hypebeast shyt. Yall gassin anything they say
Why would NBA players cancel association with JJ over a story from his rookie year where a girl with a history of scamming NBA stars accused JJ's brother of writing a racial slur, but the claim was so weak that only one gossip site even briefly covered it? If there's more evidence then show it, but if the only source is that gossip site then it's a nothingburger.
Why not do a podcast with someone who isn't a smug cac that likely used racist slurs in his time at Duke?
I just doubt that NBA players would take allegations like seriously. He has 4 years playing at Duke and 15 years in the NBA which they most likely use to base their opinions of him on.