True, they're strictly e-revolutionariesThey not about that life though. Did you catch the Meta Reign-Larry Silverstein incident on sohh?
he knows all the secrets but for some weird reason he is still aliveThanks alex jones
Oswald being silenced afterward should have solidified his statement...sometimes you have to take a case by case basisSo if Oswald said he was a patsy( which he did) before he was killed would you consider him one or the crazed lone gunman that killed Kennedy?
he knows all the secrets but for some weird reason he is still alive
Have you seen the note? Have you read what it says?
one man having a few pesos don't mean sh1t when families spread all over the world influencing sh1t on the low. individual billionaires can be knocked off their socks like that brazilian and gadafi.What people need to realize is that the way that ownership of land and corporations are set up makes it so we can never know the extent to which the rockefeller or rothschilds control things. If you dont think whomever the biggest shareholders of the BoAs, JP Morgan chases,and exxons of the world control how everything plays out you are delusional. People would rather blame CEOs. CEOs that make maybe 50 million a year, which is really nothing in the grand scheme. I think everything is based around the federal reserve and the endless war.
im really supposed to believe the worlds richest man is some mexican?
How much traction is this shyt gaining? The other day, my co-workers were telling me they saw some kingsmen nearby standing in the street with signs talking about the Federal Reserve and the government and promoting infowars.com.
So if Oswald said he was a patsy( which he did) before he was killed would you consider him one or the crazed lone gunman that killed Kennedy?
Why do you believe there is a note... Cause the tv told you?
Those people who speak on the NWO don't go through the security checkpoints because they are special privileged. Some have private jets. I love how you think Global Financial Reform has nothing to do with land grabs, creating wars and conflicts, stealing resources, crippling nations and destroying national sovereignty. Every person who said it has been apart of the list I placed in front of you
use false equivalencies to all unexplained phenomena, brehs
on this note, why do you even think there was a shooting?
He said the rule of law and order, so he was referring to "dropping them thangs" to restore or bring forth a novel "order". The point is that it's just not about financing, its all encompassing ........... its global standards ..... you can argue whether that's good or bad ...... personally its ambiguous to me ....... ...... my point is that people try and sugarcoat what it is, and then call folks conspiracytards/looney toons (which is not an academic term either I don't believe), when trying to showcase evidence that the MSM seems to shun or deny ... that's all really
Global standards VS National Sovereignty ........ its not looney toonery, its what is happening in our world right now .......
Is there a nefarious/evil aspect to these global standards????????????????????
Well .... in a lot of folks opinions, and if you look at the evidence, its some debatable things based on history and based on current events ...... a person that takes a few moments to listen to all sides of the issues (and I do) can see the motives ...... come across ........................ sometimes .... questionable ...... which leads to amibiguity