LAX shooter was libertarian conspiratard

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,285
Daps
30,746
The case? What case....the official report is the lib conspirator shot and killed people in LAX and hated the NWO and TSA. End of story.
:what: are you talking about, man. I thought you were talking about Kennedy, and now you switch back?

Plus, why would someone go out of their way to obfuscate this? Do you have any evidence that it was done so?
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
Anybody knows no person who is a nut is going to claim to be one, people who are crazy hate the word crazy. Damn you guys are gullible.

The 'nut' part was from me. Derived from the fact that he was ranting and raving about the NWO and fiat currency (both terms being nearly exclusively by conspiracy nuts), the rest is what he wrote.

He did not say 'I am a duck', he said 'I have white feathers and have a bill and quack.' And then went and shot at some TSA agents. Not a stretch to call the guy a nut.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,959
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
For clarification my sheeple brehs???

A. There is no such thing/agenda/platform as NWO or global governance??
B. Or are yall saying disagreeing with it is bad??
C. Believing in it is bad... whether it has been stated or not??

^^^ Which one of these is correct or all three or none?? Which one is it??:patrice: :lupe:

Cause according to some Big Playas in politics, finance, and industry ...... there is/should be such an agenda .... whether its good or bad, is up to you to decide....... but there is a plan ....... its not rocket science

Your favorite Big Playas' NWO quotes .......... out their mouths ........

Nobody is defending violence BTW ..... . But this purposeful ignorance (cognitive dissonance) dance is pretty amazing :whoo: ......

It's like somebody saying: "Martin King Luther King, Jr never ever said the I Have Dream speech"....... and they insist without flinching that he never said it, although you got video on top of video from different angles and transcripts, newspaper articles, magazines stories, books written and 1st hand accounts of people who were there in the crowd and on the platform saying he said exactly that .... and then calling people irrational or delusional for believing that he said I Have a Dream ..... :wow: .....



:popcorn: ... I'll wait
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
The 'nut' part was from me. Derived from the fact that he was ranting and raving about the NWO and fiat currency (both terms being nearly exclusively by conspiracy nuts), the rest is what he wrote.

He did not say 'I am a duck', he said 'I have white feathers and have a bill and quack.' And then went and shot at some TSA agents. Not a stretch to call the guy a nut.

Have you seen the note? Have you read what it says?

Bill Clinton, Obama, Biden, Henry Kissinger, Bush Sr. and Jr. and many European officials rant and rave about the NWO so are they nuts?
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
For clarification my sheeple brehs???

A. There is no such thing/agenda/platform as NWO or global governance??
B. Or are yall saying disagreeing with it is bad??
C. Believing in it is bad... whether it has been stated or not??

^^^ Which one of these is correct or all three or none?? Which one is it??:patrice: :lupe:

Cause according to some Big Playas in politics, finance, and industry ...... there is/should be such an agenda .... whether its good or bad, is up to you to decide....... but there is a plan ....... its not rocket science

Your favorite Big Playas' NWO quotes .......... out their mouths ........

Nobody is defending violence BTW ..... . But this purposeful ignorance (cognitive dissonance) dance is pretty amazing :whoo: ......

It's like somebody saying: "Martin King Luther King, Jr never ever said the I Have Dream speech"....... and they insist without flinching that he never said it, although you got video on top of video from different angles and transcripts, newspaper articles, magazines stories, books written and 1st hand accounts of people who were there in the crowd and on the platform saying he said exactly that .... and then calling people irrational or delusional for believing that he said I Have a Dream ..... :wow: .....



:popcorn: ... I'll wait


I forgot a buzzword used by conspiracy advocates.

I watched your video. It was a bunch of politicians using the term 'New World Order'. Only one mentioned the possibility of losing any bit of sovereignty in dealing with this. I think you're confusing globalization and a worldwide economy that's so interconnected that international standards must be established with something out of a James Bond movie.

I'm saying there is no New World Order as I believe you think of one. These big name players are talking about financial reform. It's actually pretty boring stuff and certainly much more mild than reptilians that are secretly Jews running banks or whatever it is Alex Jones says this week.
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
Have you seen the note? Have you read what it says?

Bill Clinton, Obama, Biden, Henry Kissinger, Bush Sr. and Jr. and many European officials rant and rave about the NWO so are they nuts?

No I haven't. Do you have a link?

Those people aren't taking ARs to airports and certainly aren't talking about fiat currency. You're confusing global financial reform with a bad 80's movie. You and Kissinger are using the same term and meaning much different things.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
I forgot a buzzword used by conspiracy advocates.

I watched your video. It was a bunch of politicians using the term 'New World Order'. Only one mentioned the possibility of losing any bit of sovereignty in dealing with this. I think you're confusing globalization and a worldwide economy that's so interconnected that international standards must be established with something out of a James Bond movie.

I'm saying there is no New World Order as I believe you think of one. These big name players are talking about financial reform. It's actually pretty boring stuff and certainly much more mild than reptilians that are secretly Jews running banks or whatever it is Alex Jones says this week.

Sorry my friend....the globalization has always been talked about as the NWO. But since you think there is another NWO others are speaking of....bring your evidence foward.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
No I haven't. Do you have a link?

Those people aren't taking ARs to airports and certainly aren't talking about fiat currency. You're confusing global financial reform with a bad 80's movie. You and Kissinger are using the same term and meaning much different things.

Why do you believe there is a note... Cause the tv told you?

Those people who speak on the NWO don't go through the security checkpoints because they are special privileged. Some have private jets. I love how you think Global Financial Reform has nothing to do with land grabs, creating wars and conflicts, stealing resources, crippling nations and destroying national sovereignty. Every person who said it has been apart of the list I placed in front of you
 

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
Sorry my friend....the globalization has always been talked about as the NWO. But since you think there is another NWO others are speaking of....bring your evidence foward.

Dude there is no evidence. Your theory is that there is a worldwide cabal of politicians and bankers set on world domination but they talk about it on TV every once in a while just because. I think the burden of proof lies on you.
The last guy on the video that they confronted in the street stood there because there is nothing you can say to something that crazy. There is no response to gibberish. I have no evidence to prove that this thing that is not happening is not real.

Why do you believe there is a note... Cause the tv told you?

Those people who speak on the NWO don't go through the security checkpoints because they are special privileged. Some have private jets. I love how you think Global Financial Reform has nothing to do with land grabs, creating wars and conflicts, stealing resources, crippling nations and destroying national sovereignty. Every person who said it has been apart of the list I placed in front of you

No. I read news reports on it. Does that make it false? Like the video that was posted about Clinton and Bush Sr talking about the NWO?
I'm not saying politics is clean but financial reform and a bunch of rich guys does not make a global conspiracy.
Maybe I should have asked first. What is the agenda of this NWO?
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,959
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
I forgot a buzzword used by conspiracy advocates.

I watched your video. It was a bunch of politicians using the term 'New World Order'. Only one mentioned the possibility of losing any bit of sovereignty in dealing with this. I think you're confusing globalization and a worldwide economy that's so interconnected that international standards must be established with something out of a James Bond movie.

I'm saying there is no New World Order as I believe you think of one. These big name players are talking about financial reform. It's actually pretty boring stuff and certainly much more mild than reptilians that are secretly Jews running banks or whatever it is Alex Jones says this week.

what term do you suggest?? :ohhh:

Oh yeah that OTHER NWO :usure: ....... so I'm talking Hulkamania and his crew and they are ONLY referring to financial incentives, and has nothing to do with global governance ..... right???

The very first video with George Dubya The First WASN'T REFERRING TO FINANCIAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS .... it is either the leadup or the end of the Gulf War in 1991 .... THAT"S WHAT HE IS REFERRING TO .... http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/pal/pal10.htm



I remember seeing this on live TV, of course I had no idea what he was talking about at the time
 
Last edited:

Handsback

All Star
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,381
Reputation
430
Daps
4,879
Reppin
NULL
what term do you suggest?? :ohhh:

Oh yeah that OTHER NWO :usure: ....... so I'm talking Hulkamania and his crew and they are referring to financial incentives, and has nothing to do with global governance ..... right???

The very first video with George Dubya The First has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FINANCIAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS .... it is either the leadup or the end of the Gulf War in 1991 .... THAT"S WHAT HE IS REFERRING TO .... http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/pal/pal10.htm

I remember seeing this on live TV, of course I had no idea what he was talking about at the time

I suggest a realignment of thinking. That whole 'sheeple' thing is indicative of someone who is suddenly 'in the know' but no one else is and just likes to watch TV and believes WHATEVER the picture box tells them to. It is narcissism without the class or prestige usually associated with it. Academics and politicians and businessmen don't use the term. No one respectable or particularly intelligent does. Libertarian activists do. It's the same sudden snooty and pretentious air that has always been associated with vegetarians and hipsters.

And you mean the invasion of Kuwait that caused oil shocks doesn't have anything to do with the interconnectedness of global financial markets? I didn't know unrest in the Middle East and resulting increase in gas prices has NOTHING to do with money. Learn something new everyday.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
Dude there is no evidence. Your theory is that there is a worldwide cabal of politicians and bankers set on world domination but they talk about it on TV every once in a while just because. I think the burden of proof lies on you.
The last guy on the video that they confronted in the street stood there because there is nothing you can say to something that crazy. There is no response to gibberish. I have no evidence to prove that this thing that is not happening is not real.



No. I read news reports on it. Does that make it false? Like the video that was posted about Clinton and Bush Sr talking about the NWO?
I'm not saying politics is clean but financial reform and a bunch of rich guys does not make a global conspiracy.
Maybe I should have asked first. What is the agenda of this NWO?

1. My theory? Let's hear it from CFR member Carroll Quigley( mentor of Bill Clinton)...

"At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, had asits nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company.... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." [Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952]


"The powers of financial capitalism has another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole." [Quigley, pp.324]

Seems to me that Mr. Quigley knew the truth. You are in denial.

You have no evidence that the NWO every "nut" is speaking of is different from the NWO you are speaking of.

2. Wow so do you believe stories in the newspaper 100% of the time? The video of the them actually saying it is much different than words in a newspaper that you can't clarify if they said it or not. That was a failed argument. Rich men making decisions for the whole world with no one else allowed to do so is just the very thing you claim "conspiracy". Why should I speak on the agenda if your mind is made up. You claim to know what the NWO is...so why should I tell you....you know it already.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,959
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
I suggest a realignment of thinking. That whole 'sheeple' thing is indicative of someone who is suddenly 'in the know' but no one else is and just likes to watch TV and believes WHATEVER the picture box tells them to. It is narcissism without the class or prestige usually associated with it. Academics and politicians and businessmen don't use the term. No one respectable or particularly intelligent does. Libertarian activists do. It's the same sudden snooty and pretentious air that has always been associated with vegetarians and hipsters.

And you mean the invasion of Kuwait that caused oil shocks doesn't have anything to do with the interconnectedness of global financial markets? I didn't know unrest in the Middle East and resulting increase in gas prices has NOTHING to do with money. Learn something new everyday.

He said the rule of law and order, so he was referring to "dropping them thangs" to restore or bring forth a novel "order". The point is that it's just not about financing, its all encompassing ........... its global standards ..... you can argue whether that's good or bad ...... personally its ambiguous to me ....... ...... my point is that people try and sugarcoat what it is, and then call folks conspiracytards/looney toons (which is not an academic term either I don't believe), when trying to showcase evidence that the MSM seems to shun or deny ... that's all really :manny:

Global standards VS National Sovereigny ........ its not looney toonery, its what is happening in our world right now .......

Is there a nefarious/evil aspect to these global standards????????????????????

Well .... in a lot of folks opinions, and if you look at the evidence, its some debatable things based on history and based on current events ...... a person that takes a few moments to listen to all sides of the issues (and I do) can see the motives ...... come across ........................ sometimes .... questionable :patrice: ...... which leads to amibiguity
 
Last edited:
Top