I admittedly don't know enough about that case to comment either way
The case? What case....the official report is the lib conspirator shot and killed people in LAX and hated the NWO and TSA. End of story.
I admittedly don't know enough about that case to comment either way
are you talking about, man. I thought you were talking about Kennedy, and now you switch back?The case? What case....the official report is the lib conspirator shot and killed people in LAX and hated the NWO and TSA. End of story.
Anybody knows no person who is a nut is going to claim to be one, people who are crazy hate the word crazy. Damn you guys are gullible.
The 'nut' part was from me. Derived from the fact that he was ranting and raving about the NWO and fiat currency (both terms being nearly exclusively by conspiracy nuts), the rest is what he wrote.
He did not say 'I am a duck', he said 'I have white feathers and have a bill and quack.' And then went and shot at some TSA agents. Not a stretch to call the guy a nut.
For clarification my sheeple brehs???
A. There is no such thing/agenda/platform as NWO or global governance??
B. Or are yall saying disagreeing with it is bad??
C. Believing in it is bad... whether it has been stated or not??
^^^ Which one of these is correct or all three or none?? Which one is it??
Cause according to some Big Playas in politics, finance, and industry ...... there is/should be such an agenda .... whether its good or bad, is up to you to decide....... but there is a plan ....... its not rocket science
Your favorite Big Playas' NWO quotes .......... out their mouths ........
Nobody is defending violence BTW ..... . But this purposeful ignorance (cognitive dissonance) dance is pretty amazing ......
It's like somebody saying: "Martin King Luther King, Jr never ever said the I Have Dream speech"....... and they insist without flinching that he never said it, although you got video on top of video from different angles and transcripts, newspaper articles, magazines stories, books written and 1st hand accounts of people who were there in the crowd and on the platform saying he said exactly that .... and then calling people irrational or delusional for believing that he said I Have a Dream ..... .....
... I'll wait
Have you seen the note? Have you read what it says?
Bill Clinton, Obama, Biden, Henry Kissinger, Bush Sr. and Jr. and many European officials rant and rave about the NWO so are they nuts?
I forgot a buzzword used by conspiracy advocates.
I watched your video. It was a bunch of politicians using the term 'New World Order'. Only one mentioned the possibility of losing any bit of sovereignty in dealing with this. I think you're confusing globalization and a worldwide economy that's so interconnected that international standards must be established with something out of a James Bond movie.
I'm saying there is no New World Order as I believe you think of one. These big name players are talking about financial reform. It's actually pretty boring stuff and certainly much more mild than reptilians that are secretly Jews running banks or whatever it is Alex Jones says this week.
No I haven't. Do you have a link?
Those people aren't taking ARs to airports and certainly aren't talking about fiat currency. You're confusing global financial reform with a bad 80's movie. You and Kissinger are using the same term and meaning much different things.
Sorry my friend....the globalization has always been talked about as the NWO. But since you think there is another NWO others are speaking of....bring your evidence foward.
Why do you believe there is a note... Cause the tv told you?
Those people who speak on the NWO don't go through the security checkpoints because they are special privileged. Some have private jets. I love how you think Global Financial Reform has nothing to do with land grabs, creating wars and conflicts, stealing resources, crippling nations and destroying national sovereignty. Every person who said it has been apart of the list I placed in front of you
I forgot a buzzword used by conspiracy advocates.
I watched your video. It was a bunch of politicians using the term 'New World Order'. Only one mentioned the possibility of losing any bit of sovereignty in dealing with this. I think you're confusing globalization and a worldwide economy that's so interconnected that international standards must be established with something out of a James Bond movie.
I'm saying there is no New World Order as I believe you think of one. These big name players are talking about financial reform. It's actually pretty boring stuff and certainly much more mild than reptilians that are secretly Jews running banks or whatever it is Alex Jones says this week.
what term do you suggest??
Oh yeah that OTHER NWO ....... so I'm talking Hulkamania and his crew and they are referring to financial incentives, and has nothing to do with global governance ..... right???
The very first video with George Dubya The First has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH FINANCIAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS .... it iseither the leadup orthe end of the Gulf War in 1991 .... THAT"S WHAT HE IS REFERRING TO .... http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/pal/pal10.htm
I remember seeing this on live TV, of course I had no idea what he was talking about at the time
Dude there is no evidence. Your theory is that there is a worldwide cabal of politicians and bankers set on world domination but they talk about it on TV every once in a while just because. I think the burden of proof lies on you.
The last guy on the video that they confronted in the street stood there because there is nothing you can say to something that crazy. There is no response to gibberish. I have no evidence to prove that this thing that is not happening is not real.
No. I read news reports on it. Does that make it false? Like the video that was posted about Clinton and Bush Sr talking about the NWO?
I'm not saying politics is clean but financial reform and a bunch of rich guys does not make a global conspiracy.
Maybe I should have asked first. What is the agenda of this NWO?
I suggest a realignment of thinking. That whole 'sheeple' thing is indicative of someone who is suddenly 'in the know' but no one else is and just likes to watch TV and believes WHATEVER the picture box tells them to. It is narcissism without the class or prestige usually associated with it. Academics and politicians and businessmen don't use the term. No one respectable or particularly intelligent does. Libertarian activists do. It's the same sudden snooty and pretentious air that has always been associated with vegetarians and hipsters.
And you mean the invasion of Kuwait that caused oil shocks doesn't have anything to do with the interconnectedness of global financial markets? I didn't know unrest in the Middle East and resulting increase in gas prices has NOTHING to do with money. Learn something new everyday.