Me thinks the coward is the militant terrorist trying to surround himself and hide by civilian targets to avoid being hit.
Last Year President Obama Reportedly Told His Aides That He's 'Really Good At Killing People'
- Thread starter Julius Skrrvin
- Start date
Me thinks the coward is the militant terrorist trying to surround himself and hide by civilian targets to avoid being hit.
In your world of black or white, this or that, up or down.....sure.
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
I WAS WONDERING HOW DEMOCRATS WOULD DEFEND THIS OBVIOUSLY INSENSITIVE REMARK, BROTHER!
Lucky_Lefty
Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Some people say they're really good at killing people. Others say either you with us or against us when going to war on false pretenses and killing and unknown number if civilians. Guess morality depends on what side of the aisle you sit on 
Tommy Knocks
retired
He aint killing shyt tho, its like killing an ant when you have thousands crawling around your house, sittin back talkin about you're good at killing ants, no you're not. You're not killing shyt, stop wasting money and spawning more ants. fukk.
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Me thinks the coward is the militant terrorist trying to surround himself and hide by civilian targets to avoid being hit.
That's what you think every civilian death is? You must have either (a) not been paying attention or (b) ignored the facts.
Classified documents reveal CIA drone strikes often killed unknown people
There are more examples of this if you wish to see it. Just let me know.
1) The President orders the strikes that he brags about
2) The Strikes sometimes targeted unknown people and sometimes first responders
3) The President owns responsibility for that (your words)
So, what isn't a war crime exactly?
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Yea, but the don usually has to earn his place. The Boss had to come from the ranks, took orders and did dirt.
Not the case here.
Hollywood Co
Primetime Reppin
Type Username Here
Not a new member
How are you so sure Obama hasn't gotten his hands dirty though?
Does your dikkriding know any bounds?
Lol...RT?!?...really Type really???..that's your source for news??? Putin controlled media???
Lets examine number one first....what validates that he said that line verbatim or if he used those words in that context. Is the quote even real?!?
You do know the best way to sell books is through sensationalism right?
Type Username Here
Not a new member
Ok, I'll give you more sources:
NBC NEWS:
http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_...ng-in-drone-strikes-classified-documents-show
WSJ:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204621904577013982672973836
GUARDIAN:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/20/us-drones-strikes-target-rescuers-pakistan
There is much more.
What's your next diversion?
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
I'm sorry, does it matter how we kill people?
Type Username Here
Not a new member
That wasn't my point. Don't know how you ever got there from the sources I presented
There is an outcry, human rights orgs have especially been upset recently. But as much as I dislike our drone policy (sidenote: remember when I tried to make a large drone war sticky so it would not be out of sight, out of mind and I was supposedly protecting Obama....yes I am definitely having one of my I told you so moments out loud right now), this quote is decontextualized hearsay that shouldn't make you feel anyway that you didn't feel before. Anyone getting emotional based on this alone needs to quit with the posturing. It was just a means to get views for an article.
As for Obama increasing the drone war, that's a given. Most people took drone war>> over troops on the ground. Though most did not realize just how inaccurate it would be, nor its scope and there lies the moral hazard. As much as the international community wants to complain about it, the rest of the world tacitly condones it because the US acts as their police force so they don't have to commit as many resources to their military and they can instead spend it on their civilians. By the world, I mean their governments, not their citizenry. I don't know why people get caught up in that game. Most drone strikes are launched against people based on communications and interactions they have with certain individuals, when I was in college a professor even brought in a friend from the CIA to demonstrate how mathematical models and networks are used to identify potentially hostile and terrorist networks. He explicitly stated that there was nothing exact about that process alone. Anyone who thought this guy wasn't going to drop bombs wasn't paying attention:
With that said, I still don't know what the alternative to the drone war is, but it obviously sets a dangerous precedent and it devalues the lives of human beings who are away from American shores.
Is that why everything said in his 5 years was a lie?