010101
C L O N E*0690//////
all i know is the world better hope the sun never shines on us again
we got all the money all the clout & generations of pain ready for the opps
y'all ot nikkas pray pray pray that #tape don't ever get right
*
An actual Knicks fan . Who are you?
This is great news for all of us who’ve been pleasantly surprised at all that g-league development we’ve seen recently. He’s coming to the pro squad.
Also offseason development tidbit
You think a front court of randle and Robinson would mesh well?This says a lot. They are going all in on development and probably giving up on using the youth as pieces.
I could see the DLo and Randle Smoke making some more sense too cause they aren’t bad. They just got to defend better or be surrounded by defenders
You think a front court of randle and Robinson would mesh well?
This is great news for all of us who’ve been pleasantly surprised at all that g-league development we’ve seen recently. He’s coming to the pro squad.
Also offseason development tidbit
Can randle stretch the floor though?I think Robinson can mask a lot of Randle's deficiencies.
Russell/Barrett/Knox/Randle/Robinson would be an entertaining team to watch(they won't be good, but that's besides the point)
You think a front court of randle and Robinson would mesh well?
Can randle stretch the floor though?
Now this man, I trust him for development. We’ve seen the results, hopefully he has a big role.
This says a lot. They are going all in on development and probably giving up on using the youth as pieces.
I could see the DLo and Randle Smoke making some more sense too cause they aren’t bad. They just got to defend better or be surrounded by defenders
I REALLY hate the idea of adding both. I'm not particularly enthusiastic on adding either. I don't think D-Lo is a number one on a championship team and I don't think Randle is a number two on a championship team. For all intents and purposes, you'd be paying them that kinda money though. So you're paying them hoping that they'll continue to progress, paying for what they might become. Not what they are. Granted I like it better than paying a Butler or a Middleton; I'd rather eat bad contracts and add assets. Maybe you add one of those guys too, but I don't want to devote such a huge chunk of cap space into two guys that we're paying for where they're supposed to get instead of where they're at (especially not ones who couldn't play defense hard in contract years...that's scary, even THJ didn't have that problem).
Here's my first target too...
Ilyasova's contract isn't half bad and his skillset is a logical fit next to Mitch. He'd be a solid stopgap vet with rangy offense and we'd get a pick where some mocks have Samanic or Thybulle around...maybe you can swing on Bazley there too (limited footage has me extremely intrigued).
Nah, it's definitely the point. You're not getting either unless you commit 4 year deals at/or very close to the max, and this team isn't in position to do that.I think Robinson can mask a lot of Randle's deficiencies.
Russell/Barrett/Knox/Randle/Robinson would be an entertaining team to watch(they won't be good, but that's besides the point)