They're black supremacists who are grasping straws. They want to believe those lies to show they are somehow superior to all other races to make up for the fact that blacks throughout the world, past and present, have gotten the short of the stick. Instead of gaining and sharing knowledge that might actual benefit their communities, they push this garbage.
Its just not an issue among some in the black community though, you can find white supremacists who believe in pseudoscience to justify prior treatment of African/blacks.
I hear it even from some of my family who are descendants of the indigenous American population. According to one uncle, the Americas was a land of peace and love before the Europeans got here.
Only one poster is saying that Albinism is white people or whatever. However, not all black supremacist feel the need to make up for what YOu consider black failures past present and through the worlds history. However, even some of those that do feel superior also gain and share knowledge that has actually benefited their community- and that goes for proud members of all racial groups.
IMO, a person doesn't need pseudo science to feel superior.
On subject though- Albinism is the inheritance of recessive genes. If both sides of the family have DNA cells that can't produce melanin then the child has a higher chance of being born albino.
The human Genome project states that human beings have a 0.1% genetic variation that causes differences in racial identities. Albinism is inherited. So is all other forms of skin pigmentation. In the original and current populations of what we consider Caucasians; inherited genes have cause them to not have skin pigmentation that benefits them on Earth. Light skin, dark skin, and albinism are all autosomal chromosomes... but albinism is a recessive trait so you can carry it even if you don't display it.
So zeus is incorrect in implying the color of the parent has Anything to do the chances of Albinism or the version that the child can get. zero was wrong about the cradle of civilization only being in the middle east; other areas stopped being huntergathers by then. And to try to make some sort of connection with this statement is basically ignorant, " It's true that some Indians and Central Asians and Middle Eastern and European people are related in some way... but that's also where the cradle of civilization was".
And since you mention the 'black short end of the stick' what do you think about people saying virtually all the victim groups of genocide in the Twentieth Century had relatively high average levels of achievement? Maybe the sole reason that black are the group that don't match these levels is because the were too busy grasping straws instead of books. Think about the historical reasons that blacks may have clung to black supremacist ideology and other random sh1t instead of trying to run the worlds banks.
"As humans migrated north, the absence of high levels of solar radiation in northern Europe and Asia relaxed the selective pressure on active MC1R, allowing the gene to mutate into dysfunctional variants without reproductive penalty, then propagate by genetic drift"
As we advanced into modern humans, losing hair, developing more sweat glands, natural selection was putting these "pressures" on our development j- when we relaxed those pressures it caused dysfunction.. And with that dysfunction "evolution used the extra biological capitol for other adaptations".