Lamar Jackson >>>> Joe Burrow
- Thread starter 2legit
- Start date
Piff Perkins
Veteran
I get that Burrow doesn't want to look like he signed a massive deal and dipped with an injury but he shouldn't be playing right now. He's not healthy and the Bengals are idiots for allowing him to suit up.
Bboystyle
Bang Bang Packers gang!
@NYC Rebel u remember our old debate on Murray vs Lamar? 
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
Lamar is looking nice this year with good Wide Receivers. You have any comments @Thavoiceofthevoiceless on how your boy Burrow is looking trash
Is Burrows my boy? He’s also injured or did you forget that?
Joe Burrow is injury prone. There is a double standard that Lamar gets criticized for being injury prone while Joe Burrow has a worse track record for injuries.
Either way, Lamar is looking nice this year once his team invested in receivers. If you gave him Chase and Higgins, he is winning the MVP.
Lamar isn't averaging 200 yards passing a game. He's on pace to match his performance from last year.
They still aren't a serious passing team.
They still aren't a serious passing team.
Team stat.
And their passing offense looked like ass in the L to Indy.
Godless Socialist CEO
Superstar
Allen and Healthy Burrow are right there or better than Lamar. I don’t care for Herbert. All that dude does is lose and until that changes he doesn’t belong in the conversation with the other three
28 Gramz
How U Luv That???
They're all better QBs. Burrow is just hurt right now.
I'm not ranking him as an elite QB with less than 200 yards a game. That doesn't translate to the playoffs when you need to put up big points in shootouts.
The interesting part about it is that you had posters on this site insisting that the new OC and weapons would make the passing attack and offense more potent, when it's essentially the EXACT same offense they've been trotting out on the field these past years.
OBJ is washed, yet you had people on this site thinking he could still be a #1 receiver.
Last edited:
Similar threads
