Ego?
We wouldn't be having this little spat had your ego allowed you to move on from my post, and go on about your day instead of trying to shame me for my preferences in a mate. You "asked a question", and then went on to answer it yourself under the assumption of what I would say. You weren't looking for an actual response, so you can cut that out. Except for the fact that I haven't discussed why I would prefer a partner who isn't a smart as I am nor have I discussed things like "elevating partners in relationships", so you're not using my logic at all to ask these questions. That was all assumed by you in some silly attempt to one up me. I am having a conversation with a guy "not quite sharp enough" to talk about these things.
lmao, woman you made a thread on a fukking public forum, me
responding to the thread that
you made has very little to do with my "ego". you made statements, and thus I gave my opinion on those statements because you opened up a public space that allowed and asked for me to do so. completely different. despite what you may think, a thread isn't supposed to be exclusively comprised of people who will share your sentiments, or agree with you.
Also, you claimed I never meant for an actual response? lol i find it difficult to understand how you could come to that conclusion, when in that post did i answer with something that "I thought you would say?" do you remember the question? here, let me post it again for you:
Are you implying that a man by nature cannot elevate you? Which in it of itself would make your "men hold themselves in high regard" sentiment a product of irony; and also a contradiction being that you acknowledged the fact that a man can be smarter than you.
See? it was an extended question that was stated in such a way that basically says "if this IS what you think, then here is why it makes little sense" there is not one area where I actually " answered the question". Have you not been in a debate before? structuring difficult questions that simultaneously show flaws in logic is a common practice in debate lol
If this were a proper one and you had something to actually SAY regarding that question i had, then you would immediately directly respond to them, and not deflect and evade, instead you simply called me self-important, and said I was making assumptions...without explaining why and how those were assumptions.
Except for the fact that I haven't discussed why I would prefer a partner who isn't a smart as I am nor have I discussed things like "elevating partners in relationships", so you're not using my logic at all to ask these questions
lol are you stupid? when you make a statement that says "i don't want a guy smarter than me" It's highly sensible to conclude that you are then potentially inhibiting the concept of someone else helping you grow as a person. better than you at something=opportunity to elevate. do you not understand that? why do you think i asked those questions? it is BECAUSE you didn't mention those things, that i asked those questions.
I am having a conversation with a guy "not quite sharp enough" to talk about these things.
Oh i get it, intelligence is not recognized when it isn't
convenient for you. because let's be honest, I've proven in this thread that I have a particular aptitude to convey my ideas, the numerous daps and kudos I've received from this thread verify that.
you however have met every questioning towards your sentiments with vague, piss poor articulation. such as:
While my statement implies that it's not the intent of that statement
lmao^
you just don't
like those ideas because they negatively reflect on you. and therefore your own personal biases will conclude that I am """""not smart""""" (which is hilarious, because you sure aren't winning this little squabble) lol because that is more of a convenient stance for you to take. in other words, you're delusional, you'll probably think a guy that doesn't argue with you is smart enough for you though...
