Kurt Angle should be a lock for everyone's list of Top 5 Greatest Wrestlers

Heelish

#TSC #spooky
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
7,147
Daps
80,542
But it ain't the Best Moonsault Ever

best-moonsault-ever-o.gif
Never really liked it, honestly. Then again, I never got into Daniels like that other than his Fallen Angel gimmick.
That shyt was reckless as fukk. Hated him doing that
Agreed 100%.
 

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
190,655
Reputation
19,220
Daps
481,941
Never really liked it, honestly. Then again, I never got into Daniels like that other than his Fallen Angel gimmick.

Agreed 100%.
Yeah it definitely AINT the best moonsault ever, nice name tho
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,252
Reputation
5,831
Daps
108,682
Reppin
Chile
The obligatory "TSC treats Kurt like gawd" thread :heh:

The most talented wrestler ever. Didn't reach his full potential, not my top 5. I'm too lazy to post the same shyt again so I'll just c/p what I wrote last year
To me, it's about a combination of story, drama and crowd reaction. At some point of his career, Kurt realized that crowd popped big for a lot of suplexes, reversals, nearfalls and a fast pace; so he decided to throw the story of a match to the bushes most of the time so he could do the other things that popped the crowd (because they looked cool, were executed very well and had a quick pace).

There's nothing wrong with it because the fans obviously loved it and he's regarded as one of the best to ever do it - specially here in TSC - but to me that was kinda lazy on his part because he could do so much more when telling a story, every once in a while Kurt could pull off an amazing match with great depth. But that was the exception and not the rule. I've seen enough from a bunch of other wrestlers that didn't have the execution nor the pace of Kurt, but surpassed him in creating drama due to the story they were telling (and not how a suplex or move looked) and had the crowd just as engaged. And to me, that has more value than what Angle did most of his career.

I realize this sounds way too nerdy but when grading greatness I can't help but go there. Kurt was really fukking good and a shyt ton of people will read what I just wrote and think I either have a shytty taste in wrestling or don't know what the fukk I'm talking about :heh: but I see what he was capable of and think he could've done waaay more with the talent he had. Other people did better in my eyes with a lot less than Angle.

:manny: :manny: :manny: :manny:
 

stro

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
10,020
Reputation
1,175
Daps
29,212
Reppin
Indiana
If you think you can come up with a Top 5 wrestlers list and exclude Kurt you must not have given it proper thought at all... I think besides Eddie Guerrero he is probably the most talented wrestler in history.

All time I could list at least 15-20 that were better than Kurt. In the past 15-16 years though? He'd for sure be in the top 5.
 
Top