Kobe Was Ridiculous

[10bandz]

Ain’t no way Shaq can get all the credit for the three peat and not take the blame for the sweeps when Kobe was a damn teenager

That's pretty much how they want it and think we're too stupid to see it. Fraud ass Rhakim gonna post Kobe's stats in 1999......same type of guy who completely ignores Kobe's stats in 2001 and give him no credit for the ring

 

[Foxmulder]

Ain’t no way Shaq can get all the credit for the three peat and not take the blame for the sweeps when Kobe was a damn teenager

Anyone saying Kobe was carried during the three peat either didn’t watch back then or is a disingenuous hater.

 

[LurkGod]

That's pretty much how they want it and think we're too stupid to see it. Fraud ass Rhakim gonna post Kobe's stats in 1999......same type of guy who completely ignores Kobe's stats in 2001 and give him no credit for the ring

Anyone saying Kobe was carried during the three peat either didn’t watch back then or is a disingenuous hater.

I don’t even like putting them against each other tbh they were teammates and both vital to the team winning, neither was gonna win without the other. Nobody does this with Kareem and Magic idk why they insist on doing it with Shaq and Kobe.

Talking about replacing Kobe with some damn Vince Carter is just

 

[Professor Emeritus]

i dont even know what the fukk you're talking about. First off, you're a "Blazers" that allegedly grew up right next to the Forum in the 80s, hated the Lakers you're whole life and circled back to rooting for them because of a basketball player 15 years younger than you.

Literally EVERY time you make up shyt about my background you get it wrong, I point it out, then you make up new shyt.

Other than growing up a Blazers fan and not a Lakers fan, everything you said there was wrong.

Secondly, I don't give a fukk right specific reason you got banned from the thread. You were in the thread every day caping for your mans

You're lying AGAIN. I already proved you were lying the first time you said that, from your own post:

@CHICAGO really banned @Rhakim from this thread???

I don’t think so? Last time he posted in here he said some shyt like he doesn’t post in this thread a lot because he gets shytted on it’d be weird if he got banned recently cuz he wasn’t posting a lot in here anymore anyway.

You said right then that I wasn't even posting in there very much, now you keep falsely claiming that I was posting in there every day. Just like you lied earlier claiming I had been banned for derailing the thread.

Your lie already got pointed out the first time. I've never been a top-20 poster in the Lakers thread even this year, I'm just a top-3 poster on your mind.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Ain’t no way Shaq can get all the credit for the three peat and not take the blame for the sweeps when Kobe was a damn teenager

That's pretty much how they want it and think we're too stupid to see it.

Anyone saying Kobe was carried during the three peat either didn’t watch back then or is a disingenuous hater.

I know this is a novel concept, but imagine if - shock - each player got the amount of credit for how much they contributed to the final result?

Y'all are blatantly contradicting yourselves by trying to give Shaq all the blame in 1997-1999 while giving Kobe full credit in 2000-2002, and the people who do the opposite are wrong as well.

This is why low-IQ "ring counting" is so stupid. It's not an all or nothing thing for any one player. Teams win rings, not individuals, and any time someone tries to give any individual all-or-nothing credit for a ring, they get caught in stupid contradictions.

 

[Ozymandeas]

Ain’t no way Shaq can get all the credit for the three peat and not take the blame for the sweeps when Kobe was a damn teenager

Kobe haters want it both ways

 

[IIVI]

White people LOVE Kobe, stop it ...

Low key actually true.

They stay bringing up "Mamba Mentality", at least out here.

 

[10bandz]

Literally EVERY time you make up shyt about my background you get it wrong, I point it out, then you make up new shyt.

Other than growing up a Blazers fan and not a Lakers fan, everything you said there was wrong.






You're lying AGAIN. I already proved you were lying the first time you said that, from your own post:





You said right then that I wasn't even posting in there very much, now you keep falsely claiming that I was posting in there every day. Just like you lied earlier claiming I had been banned for derailing the thread.

Your lie already got pointed out the first time. I've never been a top-20 poster in the Lakers thread even this year, I'm just a top-3 poster on your mind.

You're such a fukking dumbass, disingenous, FRADULENT nikka

you said it YOURSELF "I was banned from the thread for all of last year just because LeBron's my favorite player" in reality it wasnt "just because" he's your favorite player it was "just because" you were constantly posting dumbass shyt from your Bron dikkriding lens no one wanted to read

I never lied about shyt DANKSTER

I know this is a novel concept, but imagine if - shock - each player got the amount of credit for how much they contributed to the final result?

Y'all are blatantly contradicting yourselves by trying to give Shaq all the blame in 1997-1999 while giving Kobe full credit in 2000-2002, and the people who do the opposite are wrong as well.

This is why low-IQ "ring counting" is so stupid. It's not an all or nothing thing for any one player. Teams win rings, not individuals, and any time someone tries to give any individual all-or-nothing credit for a ring, they get caught in stupid contradictions.

Absolutely NO ONE has EVER, EVER tried to give Kobe full credit for the 3 peat......nikkas have been fighting just to get him ANY credit from fakkits like you.....look at you ONCE AGAIN disingenuously trying to muddy the narrative and what's really going on......you're fukking pathetic

 

[Dave24]

Greatest player i ever watched (outside of MJ)

Subbec

 

[10bandz]

@Rhakim first you said you got banned from the thread because Bron is your favorite player.....then you claim you got banned from the LAker thread beecause someone claimed you're not a Laker fan when there was tons of Bron fans in that thread who werent Laker fans and they didnt get banned

Look at this idiot blatantly lying.

Not one person accused me of derailing that thread. I was banned solely because someone complained that I'm not a Laker fan.

You always think you can muddy the narrative with your misleading quotes and bullshyt......you're a fraud and nothing more and as time goes on this entire forum will figure it out. bytch ass nikka

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You're such a fukking dumbass, disingenous, FRADULENT nikka

you said it YOURSELF "I was banned from the thread for all of last year just because LeBron's my favorite player" in reality it wasnt "just because" he's your favorite player it was "just because" you were constantly posting dumbass shyt from your Bron dikkriding lens no one wanted to read

I never lied about shyt DANKSTER

You just straight up proved you lied with your own post.

This fakkit talking about derailing when 1. This thread will have 150 more pages by tomorrow night 2. This nikka derails hella threads with his Bron dikk blowing behavior and 3. He got banned from this very thread years back for derailing

And now you’re here, in a Laker thread every single day for 5 years (including one year where you got banned from the thread for typing up bullshyt like trading Zo for Pat Bev)

I don't give a fukk right specific reason you got banned from the thread. You were in the thread every day caping for your mans

in reality it wasnt "just because" he's your favorite player it was "just because" you were constantly posting dumbass shyt from your Bron dikkriding lens no one wanted to read

I never lied about shyt DANKSTER

First you said I got banned for derailing, which was a lie. Then you said I was in here every day for 5 years including the year I got banned, which was a lie. Then you doubled down and said I was in there every day, repeating the same lie. Then you said I was constantly posting shyt no one wanted to read, which is another lie.

But your OWN post from that season says:

it’d be weird if he got banned recently cuz he wasn’t posting a lot in here anymore anyway.

How can you lie and claim that I was in the thread every day talking about Bron, that I was posting bullshyt constantly, when your OWN COMMENT from back then says you find it weird that I got banned because I hadn't really been posing in the thread at all?


I got banned because I'm a Bron fan, not a Laker fan, one of you bytched about it to Chicago and Chicago doesn't like me. That's literally the only reason. I never got a single warning, the ban was never attributed to a single post, and I had hardly even been posting in there anyway. It was solely some sensitive snowflake not liking who I am.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

then you claim you got banned from the LAker thread beecause someone claimed you're not a Laker fan when there was tons of Bron fans in that thread who werent Laker fans and they didnt get banned

Multiple Bron fans got banned from the thread that year, not just me. There were some others who didn't get banned because whoever the special snowflake in LWO was who complained about me to the mods didn't complain about them. Had nothing to do with what they were or were not posting.


I already have you in your own words saying at the time that you didn't think I had gotten banned, because it didn't make sense. Now, years later, you're trying to rewrite the narrative completely and claim I was banned for constant egregious behavior when your OWN WORDS at the time show I hadn't been doing anything.

 

[god shamgod]

In ‘98 EVERYBODY wanted bulls vs lakers in the finals & the jazz mopped them nikkas

Nobody wanted to see no damn jazz in the finals again lakers weren’t ready but I remember vividly that’s what the streets wanted

 

[Sunalmighty]

Bron has several more playoff game-winners (11 to 7) and more playoff buzzer-beaters (5 to 1) than Kobe does.

In fact, Bron has more playoff buzzer-beaters than any other NBA team in history outside of the Lakers and Celtics.

Only 6 players have made multiple game-winning buzzer beaters in the NBA playoffs. Who's made the most?

Stacker analyzed Basketball-Reference.com data to rank the six NBA players who have scored multiple playoff buzzer beaters.

stacker.com

Also, this stat was November 2021, so he's surpassed that one by now too:

the thread is about Kobe. someone brought up lebron and this nikka posted a photo of jordan

nikka the Sentry of stanning

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Absolutely NO ONE has EVER, EVER tried to give Kobe full credit for the 3 peat......nikkas have been fighting just to get him ANY credit from fakkits like you.....look at you ONCE AGAIN disingenuously trying to muddy the narrative and what's really going on......you're fukking pathetic

Kobestans constantly say he Kobe has 5 rings and deserves just as much credit as Shaq does. They count all those rings just as much as if he had been leading the team. They say his 5 rings are superior to other players who have 3 or 4 rings, even if those other players were the team leader and Finals MVP for more of theirs. That's what it means to give him FULL CREDIT for the rings.

That's why I say all-or-nothing ring counting is dumb. Kobe's contribution in 2000 (and the other years, but most obviously 2000) was clearly not nearly as important as Shaq's contribution. Yeah he went off some games, just like Wiggins went off some games last year, or Middleton the year before that. Yes, he played a big part in some wins, just like any good role player does. But he wasn't the main reason they won, not even close, and talking like his 78 total points in the 2000 Finals were just as meaningful as another player who put up more than that in 2 games alone is a joke.

You have to see the lack of logic for "all or nothing" ring counting. You full well know that Klay, Middleton, AD, Siakim, Kyrie, Wade, Terry, Pau, etc. don't get the same credit for their rings that Steph, Giannis, LeBron, Kawhi, Duncan, Dirk, and Kobe got. It's obvious that if you have to "ring count" at all, only the best player is going to receive the full credit. But suddenly when Kobe isn't the best player, you want the rules to change for him alone.