KKK creator Nathan Bedford Forrest is getting bushed from his grave

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

How is this dude @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited referring to the KKK as a “joke” when he acknowledged their existence in the example below: Which character are you going with this time - a role playing cac or are you back to black? What the fuk difference does it make how they “started” out as when the consequences and detrimental affect in black society yielded the same outcome - torture, murder and death.
https://www.thecoli.com/threads/the...-and-non-white-terrorists.32762/#post-1176868

All the points of this article are refuted by the existence of the KKK.

But then again - you don’t think the white race exists huh?

Nonsense. As long as you think of 'White People' as a race, you'll continue to alienate allies thereby perpetuating 'White Supremacy'.​

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Y'all do know the Klan was created as a joke, right?​

Anyhow, good riddance.​

Then why did you say this statement back in 2018, or did your white alt take back over this year:

Klan formed because 'White' people didn't want Black folks to have any rights during (and after) Reconstruction.​

Looks we have another cac code switch hitter in the midst.^^^^how does this dude go from saying the klan was formed one way back in 2018 but now all of a sudden the klan is a “joke” ???

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Google 'Pulaski, Tennessee December 24,1865'

History channel had a whole doc about it, but, the 'Klan' was originally a group of Confederate vets that got drunk on weekends, put the hoods on and rode around acting like 'ghosts' to scare Black people during Reconstruction.

Forrest, and the Democrats, changed ALL of that in 1869 by co-opting the group and directing them to target the original Republicans.....Black people.....to put Democrats back in power....

​

Reverse time back and this is what you said:

Klan formed because 'White' people didn't want Black folks to have any rights during (and after) Reconstruction.​

Black people weren't considered a part of American society until 1965 and the Government didn't let them 'run wild' on our ancestors......the Government was controlled by the Klan. By 1920, there were about 2-3 million registered Klan members in the United States. The Klan's power was so great, an endorsement by them would assure a government position up to and including the President of the United States. They even had control of a whole state......

Indiana Klan - Wikipedia​

this dude can’t keep up with his own lies. Poster went from the KKK was a “joke” frat party to having a whole different tale years back.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

"As a matter of fact, however, the Ku Klux Klan did originate as a 'hilarious social club,'....."

~Invisible Empire: The Story of the Ku Klux Klan 1866-1871, pg. 9​

But again- here you are admitting the opposite of what you said -

Klan formed because 'White' people didn't want Black folks to have any rights during (and after) Reconstruction.​

You specifically stated yourself the Klan was forming DURING and AFTER reconstruction which was 1865, now you're saying that weren’t active until 1920. So the Klan was a “hilarious social circle” your words from 1861-1867, but in another quote if yours indicates that the Klan was formed to terrorize black people before Reconstruction which had to be prior to 1869.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Y'all do know the Klan was created as a joke, right?​

Anyhow, good riddance.​

———

Naw, explain pls

It was never a joke. Sure, the costumes (Confederate ghosts) were created to scare black folk - due to our belief in spirits and ghosts.

But it was and still is -- and began to terrorize, kill and intimadate Black Americans during Reconstruction and beyond.

Smart dumb babble incoming

I think we have a cac in here

Dressing up as the ghosts of the dead confederate soldiers and terrorizing newly freed blacks was no fukking joke. You sound stupid as fukk spouting White supremacist talking points

Your the same dude that believe World Trade Center 7 was brought down by fire.

do y’all want to see an interesting coorelation do @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited ’s statement: (and yes, that is the hard (-er) word that he used). And you wonder why this dude is in here defending the KKK so defiantly-

What often gets lost in this discussion is the simple fact that the 'Klan' was actually started as a joke. Basically, a bunch of Civil War vets got together and formed a fraternity to 'fukk with ******s'. There were no overtones of political/social/financial oppression at that time. They just had nothing better to do aside from drink themselves into a stupor and go out turning their prejudices into terrorism

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded

@Deacon Frye @Wild self @HarlemHottie @Dubthahustler @CarmelBarbie @Luke Cage
@Hennessypapi @Booksnrain @DPresidential @saturn7 @#Championships
That poster vehemently defends or moves with propaganda with his The Klan was formed only as a social group along with having no problem using the word n—-er.

 

[xoxodede]

Read it.
​

That happened in 1866-1868 under Forrest.

The group, however, began in 1865 for different reasons. Read the link.
​

I"m tired of you. You are WRONG. They were violent during the first Klan as well. They were doing everything in their power to stop freedman/women from voting, fighting for their rights -- and anything else.

Ms. Parsons demonstrates as well how Republicans and Democrats, in the North and the South, used the Ku Klux Klan to enhance support for their political positions. For Republicans, the existence of a powerful Klan operating with impunity served as a compelling reason to maintain — or even increase — the presence of U.S. Army troops and other personnel in the South. Democrats, by contrast, had a vested interest in minimizing Klan activity as “youthful pranks” or isolated acts of violence. Despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, they often expressed skepticism that the organization existed at all. Ku-Klux, one newspaper editor claimed, was a “mythical maggot of distempered Republican brains.” Our Northern enemies, wrote another, “eagerly believe anything to our prejudice,” and will capitalize on it.

Throughout “Ku-Klux,” Ms. Parsons takes pains to indicate that although the first Klan was not as centralized or institutionalized as its opponents (and non-historians today) believe it was, the circulation of false and exaggerated claims did not make Klan attacks any less real and deadly. And Klan terrorism (and “the idea” of the Klan) produced fear that had enormous consequences on the associational life and political activism of African-Americans and their allies. “Ku-Klux” concludes with the discomforting observation that, alas, is confirmed by the attention recently given in our presidential primaries to David Duke and white supremacists. The Klan, Ms. Parsons reminds us, “did not materialize out of nowhere, and neither did it really go away.” Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Professor of American Studies at Cornell University.


https://sce.cornell.edu/doc/sce/altschuler/pdf/altschuler_review_20160417_1004.pdf​

In historian Elaine Frantz Parsons' new book Ku-Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction, she re-traces the organization's first steps. During a few short years from the mid 1860s to the early 1870s, the Klan went from an inside joke among a gang of a friends to a secret empire rumored to control to the entire country. But no matter how many assaults and murders the Reconstruction Klan committed, somehow it never stopped being a joke.

https://psmag.com/social-justice/ku-klux-klan-started-as-the-worlds-worst-social-club


From 1868 through the early 1870s the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) functioned as a loosely organized group of political and social terrorists. The Klan's goals included the political defeat of the Republican Party and the maintenance of absolute white supremacy in response to newly gained civil and political rights by southern blacks after the Civil War (1861-65). They were more successful in achieving their political goals than they were with their social goals during the Reconstruction era.

Ku Klux Klan in the Reconstruction Era

The first Klan flourished in the Reconstruction era, its name derived from the Greek word kuklos for circle or band; it was almost exclusively southern in its membership and mission to perpetuate white supremacy.

Ku Klux Klan | NCpedia​

 

[xoxodede]

The KKK was all over -- especially and primarily in the South.

It wasn't just TN -- were NBF was either. It wasn't a joke. They were started for the same thing - violence, intimidation, terrorism and white supremacy.

Feel free to read the MANY MANY reports of KKK violence during Reconstruction - not just TN. THE FIRST KLAN. I'm not going to post all cause I will be here all day.

Victim: BILL. Injury: whipped. Cause: political. Attacker: (white). Arrested: Remarks: this happened the latter end of October 1868. Bill and his wife were badly beaten by the Ku Klux Klan in no. 4 District.

Victim: BEN PETOSE. Injury: killed. Cause: political. Attacker: Ku Klux. Arrested: no. Remarks: PETERS (PETOSE) was killed by the Ku Klux at BERRY ARNET's plantation about Nov. 6 of 68.

Victim: Colored woman. Injury: shot in the neck. Cause: Attacker: Ku Klux. Arrested: no. Remarks: the woman was shot in the neck in the middle of Nov. 68 in the upper end of Wilkes Co. by KKK.

About November 16 of 68 a Colored man (name not known) was killed by the Ku Klux at the upper end of Wilkes County.

The Freedmen's Bureau Online | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

Date not known Tom Jourdan, shot Colored Ku Klux Klan No arrests made
Date not known Alf Rainey, hung Colored Ku Klux Klan No arrests made
Date not known Tom Kelley Colored Ku Klux Klan No arrests made

The Freedmen's Bureau Online | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

The Freedmen's Bureau Online | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

The Freedmen's Bureau Online | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

Name of offender: Ku Klux Klan. Date of outrage: 6th June. Persons injured: Nelson Joiner. Nature of injury: house burnt. Where committed: Abbeville. Remarks: parties unknown. No action possible.
​

 

[Devilinurear]

Fuming cacs are the icing on the cake

Throw that piece of shyt in a septic tank.

 

[The D-List Vet]

Y'all do know the Klan was created as a joke, right?​

Anyhow, good riddance.​

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/2012-posters-looking-funny-in-the-light-vol-274.503085/

 

[Wild self]

———














do y’all want to see an interesting coorelation do @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited ’s statement: (and yes, that is the hard (-er) word that he used). And you wonder why this dude is in here defending the KKK so defiantly-

​

@Deacon Frye @Wild self @HarlemHottie @Dubthahustler @CarmelBarbie @Luke Cage
@Hennessypapi @Booksnrain @DPresidential @saturn7 @#Championships
That poster vehemently defends or moves with propaganda with his The Klan was formed only as a social group along with having no problem using the word n—-er.

Well, times like these reveal all the bigots and c00ns in here.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

do y’all want to see an interesting coorelation do @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited ’s statement: (and yes, that is the hard (-er) word that he used). And you wonder why this dude is in here defending the KKK so defiantly-

​

I'm Black, have no problem proving it and can use the '-er' to make a point, which I did.

What was posted regarding the origin of the Klan is historically accurate and objectively verifiable.

No one in here is defending the Klan.​

 

[Ducktales]

Read it.
​

That happened in 1866-1868 under Forrest.

The group, however, began in 1865 for different reasons. Read the link.
​

Again

 

[JackRoss]

No. The Klan, itself, is the joke.​

Shut up

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

I can’t believe this dude @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited is really referencing The History Channel as a point of research over and over in this thread meanwhile he not only cancels out his own statements 2 yrs ago, as I posted from his own statements about the KKK but he makes it like he’s a fanboy, followed by the irony of his use of the hard n-er word. Can’t make this shyt up

What often gets lost in this discussion is the simple fact that the 'Klan' was actually started as a joke. Basically, a bunch of Civil War vets got together and formed a fraternity to 'fukk with ******s'. There were no overtones of political/social/financial oppression at that time. They just had nothing better to do aside from drink themselves into a stupor and go out turning their prejudices into terrorism

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded

 

[Unknown Poster]

Thread was OK until @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited started caping for the KKK then it just became real cringe worthy.