King Charles says, F YOUR JOBS to 100 staff before moving to Buckingham Palace

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
46,380
Reputation
12,594
Daps
189,166
Reppin
....
Charles … you mean the great grandfather of the Anti Christ … :hubie: Charles is an old brat … even his father knew that … Prince Phillip always used to refer to him as soft and was constantly disgusted by his behavior.:beli:

Source: The Omen / The Crown

:troll:
 

50CentStan

Allahu Akbar
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
23,439
Reputation
3,055
Daps
74,742
Reppin
The Ummah!
it's almost as bad as having a full dictator like north korea.

Nah british monarchy is the worst. Those people are okay with having them. Nk is a strong mon who would end your whole bloodline for even debating if his rule is good. Saudi and M.E countires are the same and backed by the west for their oil and regional interests. The UK is just pathetic.
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,479
Reputation
5,586
Daps
72,153
If any of y'all read the article, you'll see that it says they've been given notice of consideration for redundancy, not given notice of redundancy. It's a requirement that these letters are sent quickly upon the realization that jobs may no longer exist.

It also says in the letter, that some staff will be transferred, others will be offered opportunities elsewhere in the Royal Household, and those who are made redundant will be given enhanced redundancy packages.

Basically, this all seems like absolutely standard, and a legal requirement. Nobody has been fired. Even if you are intending to move staff from one location to another, it's required that you serve the notice because some will reject a proposed move to another location, and those people will be made redundant.

I would hang fire on passing judgment on this until you actually know what happens with the staff.
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,479
Reputation
5,586
Daps
72,153
You ain't lyin'. Prince Harry is probably Princess Diana's love child with the guy she had an affair with, James Hewitt. They look VERY similar...hair color/hairline/smile/nose...

And add to that Harry was Diana's favorite child and not William.

CFRcwfrWMAAC4Pp.jpg

People love this conspiracy theory, but they ignore the pics where Harry looks just like Charles:

prince-charles-prince-harry.jpg


He and his brother got the same pattern baldness as they pops, too. :skip:
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
14,831
Reputation
2,165
Daps
70,767
Reppin
NULL
People mad they spending tax dollars, people mad when they make cuts, make it make sense. And I don’t think people understand even if they stopped being Royal, they’d still be worth $80 to $90 billion as a family. They own like a quarter of the land in England.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,362
Reputation
30,853
Daps
762,589
Reppin
Top 4
People mad they spending tax dollars, people mad when they make cuts, make it make sense. And I don’t think people understand even if they stopped being Royal, they’d still be worth $80 to $90 billion as a family. They own like a quarter of the land in England.

No they don't
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
30,216
Reputation
4,461
Daps
114,070
Reppin
South Kakalaka
The brits say that they still have royals due to the money that they bring in, but that makes no sense.

Palace of Versailles gets 10million visitors a year

Buckingham Palace gets 500k visitors a year

The french got their royals out the paint early and their tourism is popping.
Im sure the tourism draw is bigger than palace visits. Look at how much news coverage this damn funeral is getting. I bet you more people recognize Buckingham Palace than Versailles too.
 
Top