Never go full militant
Killer Mike tried to get at Joy Reid and made a fool of himself.
- Thread starter AndroidHero
- Start date
Mind Over Thirst
Pro
What was their situation?
@ this nonsense.Just admit that you don't know how Ivy league schools work breh
Its 2018, most public and state schools have programs that can rival ivy league schools in terms on curricular.
But that's not why you go to a top university.
You go there for the connections, professors, name recognition, and clout.
Comparing a degree from Harvard to a degree from Fullsail lets me know that some of ya'll nikkas never went to college
and lol at people saying she set him up. naw bruh. mike gotta hold a whole duffle bag of Ls on this one. his dumbass was trying to deflect and drag someone else into his misery only to make himself look just as bad as the first time.
and fukk that non-apology he gave. mike need a whole row of chairs to go sit in.
A side of me wouldn't mind seeing him laugh it off in a self deprecating manner. Everybody plays the fool, no exception to the rule.
shyt that's what I would do.
I would be like "damn my B, I need to log off" followed by a bunch of twitter smileys
People in here making themselves look as foolish as Killer Mike
To be clear, I’m not a gun law advocate. I just don’t see the point of being advocates on the nra side of the issue because we will never have the same protection as white gun rights advocates under the law/constitution. I agree that we should be armed but more importantly we need to get our minds right. The reason that Cali went after the panthers with the Mulford Act is because the panthers represented blacks who had their minds on the right track. The Panthers were a real threat to the system. Right now we are no threat because our minds are fukked up. Im not a “what about black on black crime” dude because the root cause is always white supremacy but we are doing their jobs for them though. They do the gun buy-backs and all that but remember, they’re also dumping random guns in black neighborhoods and allowing the black community to be flooded with illegal guns. They could tighten the flow of illegal guns in the black community up using the laws already on the books if they really wanted to. The top of the food chain as far as the illegal gun game, is all white.
We’re not the issue here. This gun debate is about white people and their access to guns. That’s why the nra is all in. Remember, they backed the Mulford Act. I look at like this. We as black people cant depend on the law and we’re always going to have to be prepared to do whatever we have to do. I’m going to protect me and mines regardless of what the law says. If this gun control shyt results in whites having less access to guns, cool with me. If this gun control shyt leads to the nra having less power/influence in the system, cool with me. If this gun control shyt leads to more whites controlling the illegal gun game getting prosecuted and convicted then it’s cool with me.
This is all irrelevant to the point that you initially tried to make. You still haven’t proven that the gun debate now is about disarming black men. You’re all over the place now. All you proved above is that laws are enforced in a racist corrupt manner. Something that we’ve already known. Again, I’m not necessarily for or against gun laws but the fact they are in forced in a racist way doesn’t necessarily negate the merit of the law. Blacks are also targeted charged and convicted of murder at higher rates than whites, but rhatdoeant nean rhat murder should be against the law. You didn’t prove that gun laws don’t have merit, you proved that law enforcement is racist in how they enforce the gun laws.
No, you didn’t know what you were talking about. You may have googled the Mulford Act and all that after you read my post, but you were clearly ignorant of exactly what that law was before my post. You said it disarmed black men, now you want to come back with this bullshyt around the world argument which only deflects to the actual point in an attempt to save face. Integrity is scarce.
yeah, the same way someone who is given a Gucci purse might say "thanks for the Gucci" Or if you get your friend some coffee from Starbucks, they might say "Thanks for the Starbucks" Context is important, but I'll let yall cook. Like I said before, if the majority of people not in the makeup industry automatically knew she was talking about Hair & Makeup, (I didn't know people capitalized hair and makeup as proper nouns) that speaks to their interests. But in the end he admitted he jumped in head first without gaining understanding. So maybe she can have him on his show and they can debate about it because she does have people on her show that she disagrees with all the time.
