Kevin Samuels Discussion Thread

True Blue Moon

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,692
Reputation
3,625
Daps
37,173
Reppin
VA. Living in the City of Angels
Most brehs simply don’t want kids or they lack the ability to have kids (either because of a defect like low sperm count or just simply being undesirable to the point where they can’t even get sex) I’m not sure why this is shocking to most of y’all. :yeshrug:
I already covered this breh


That could be the case, but they didn't frame it that way, though. When do motherfukkers say things like "it's not looking good for me" and "I kinda accepted my fate" when it's just a matter of desire?






And one breh had another post talking about things like sperm count and testosterone.

I asked the one breh I responded to (who said that he wants kids bad) if it was a medical issue, so I already covered that.

But like I said, not wanting kids and not being able to have kids are two totally different things. I don’t know why you’re convoluting the two. The one breh further expounded that he thinks he has a medical issue, so I get that. The other breh was talking as though he wants kids but is giving up on finding someone. Since we don’t have the same biological clock as women that’s wild as fukk. A dude struggling to get sex today still has plenty of time IF he wants kids and doesn’t have medical issues.

If it was simply a matter of someone saying they don’t want kids or can’t have them I wouldn’t have even responded, because neither of those are shocking or surprising. And I definitely wouldn’t poke at a nikka that has medical problems. You completely misread the context of my post.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,668
Reppin
NULL
careful with that because that’s not how it went

Not to mention cassare :sas2:


Charleston White was right, black people are the dumbest race, you believe everything you see on twitter

Black people couldn't even own property legally, but they could own slaves which are property, you c00ns make me sick with your stupidity

The main reason why whites were against interracial relations was because they didn't want to create a third race if mixed people starting mating with each other
 

Magic Mulatto

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow. . .
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
6,358
Reputation
1,380
Daps
14,963
Charleston White was right, black people are the dumbest race, you believe everything you see on twitter

Black people couldn't even own property legally, but they could own slaves which are property, you c00ns make me sick with your stupidity

The main reason why whites were against interracial relations was because they didn't want to create a third race if mixed people starting mating with each other

Say what? :dwillhuh:
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
24,268
Reputation
7,597
Daps
131,908
Charleston White was right, black people are the dumbest race, you believe everything you see on twitter

Black people couldn't even own property legally, but they could own slaves which are property, you c00ns make me sick with your stupidity

The main reason why whites were against interracial relations was because they didn't want to create a third race if mixed people starting mating with each other
Yes they could you idiot, before Bacons Rebellion, they had to give black people acres and free them when they became Christian. There were interracial communities, runaway or not throughout the continent. Even afterwards to their discretion Slavemasters could leave land to whomever. Some Free Persons of Color were mixed women and men, they were called Gens de colour in Haiti and were killed by Haitian revolutionaries for trying to be like their fathers. Them bourgeoisie lights skins descend from them. That third race was already created before the 17th century. Before then, noble nikkas from africa who were never enslaved but were educated in Europe could own land in the Western Hemisphere before they started going heavier on race based slavery. There were quadroon balls in africa way before there were any in the US


cassare was black women on that slave coast selling their teen daughters to old white men, which gave them in roads on the contentinent

shut the fukk up and learn history you Master Sambo
 
Last edited:

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,123
Reputation
8,836
Daps
139,135
Also, forgot to add. This is a weird ass way to state a supposed stat. Who is having the other 20 % then?
 

Prodyson

All Star
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
3,940
Reputation
1,003
Daps
11,465
tenor.gif


How is... you know what, never mind?

yall really slow
the men that have more than 3 childern change the percentage :mjlol:
this so fun:russ:

So I just did a quick calculation to get an idea of what these percentages would look like if applied.

I started with random sample size of 400 men (made the math easier). I made an assumption that men with 1 or 2 kids were split evenly. I also made an assumption that men with 3 or more kids were split evenly between 3, 4, 5 and 6 kids. Obviously these assumptions aren’t perfect and there are plenty of men with much more than 6 kids and the ratio of men with 1 or 2 kids could be different. Based on these percentages and assumptions there would be 162 men with no kids, 75 men with 1 kid, 75 men with 2 kids, 22 men with 3 kids, 22 men with 4 kids, 22 men with 5 kids and 22 men with 6 kids.

Thats 621 kids total, and 396 of those kids would have been born from the men with 3 or more kids.That means that 64% of the kids would have been born from 22% of the men.

I was initially skeptical, but once you start breaking down the numbers it seems more and more possible. 80/20 might be a little generous, but if you said 24% of men father 76% it becomes a little more palatable. We ignore the people on opposites of the spectrum who have no kids and who have a whole lot of kids, and that’s what really skews the numbers. One man having 8-10 kids and another having none drastically changes the percentages. Of all of my friends, only 2 of us have children...6 of them don’t.
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
18,995
Reputation
4,145
Daps
80,800
Wrong

That's 288,000 thousand out 16 million black men in the US., factor in 50% of black men have no kids, so that number cuts to 8 million.

If each of those 288,000 (18%) has at least 2 kids that's 576k kids being born per year out wedlock...out of 38million blacks people at 14% of total pop..

That's sounds pretty accurate
I think everyone is ignoring the elephant in the room here - the prison pipeline. There were millions of black men locked up in prison, while in their youth, many of them for 20+ years

That seriously affects the number of men who are able to have kids. I think that’s where the numbers really started to change. It has little to do with morality or mating choices - these CACs just locked up all of the young eligible black men at the peak of their youth.
 

jwonder

Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
25,638
Reputation
-1,329
Daps
38,478
Reppin
DADE County
I think everyone is ignoring the elephant in the room here - the prison pipeline. There were millions of black men locked up in prison, while in their youth, many of them for 20+ years

That seriously affects the number of men who are able to have kids. I think that’s where the numbers really started to change. It has little to do with morality or mating choices - these CACs just locked up all of the young eligible black men at the peak of their youth.
But even with the prison lock up. They always exaggerated with black men having kids. If you go by what they say. Then damn near every black man should have 2 kids minimum. :gucci:
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,668
Reppin
NULL
Yes they could you idiot, before Bacons Rebellion, they had to give black people acres and free them when they became Christian. There were interracial communities, runaway or not throughout the continent. Even afterwards to their discretion Slavemasters could leave land to whomever. Some Free Persons of Color were mixed women and men, they were called Gens de colour in Haiti and were killed by Haitian revolutionaries for trying to be like their fathers. Them bourgeoisie lights skins descend from them. That third race was already created before the 17th century. Before then, noble nikkas from africa who were never enslaved but were educated in Europe could own land in the Western Hemisphere before they started going heavier on race based slavery. There were quadroon balls in africa way before there were any in the US


cassare was black women on that slave coast selling their teen daughters to old white men, which gave them in roads on the contentinent

shut the fukk up and learn history you Master Sambo

Shut your dumb ass up, when slavery was abolished black people had zero property

so you telling me during slavery black people owned land and slaves lmao

Why even talking about Haiti, nothing Haiti is relative to slavery in America or American history

get your dumb ass outta here

show me a plantation owned by a black man I can go visit like the other plantations

like Charleston White said, you dumb ass nikkaz will believe anything

and all that shyt you talking about qyadron balls have nothing to do with black people owning slaves

dumb ass c00n
 
Last edited:
Top