First off,
Quit with the bold breh, You and I ain't close like that so: Be civil and leave the ad hominem for the cacs. Ion know about the other cats you argue with on this site but as long as I'm not disrespecting you personally then I
demand you do the same.
Gang violence is about reacting to society's ills. But is reacting to society all nikkas got? That's the question. Is that an AA's destiny in life? To react to society by darkening his soul and dying for it? Or is there another way? Plenty of other AA's nowadays live another way of life, meaning that gang-banging can't be all there is a for a black man to live for.
Maybe I got it wrong though, maybe we're still in the eighties where nikkas couldn't get accepted to college in mass scale and 9 to 5s weren't even an option for most blacks. Maybe we're in 2015 were more doors are actually open for AA's and it's all a matter of surviving enough to make it to one of those doors. Ion know breh, you tell me. What do you think?
Crips, Bloods, GD's, the mafia, MS13, what-fukking-ever... all face the same conundrum:
in a war between gangs the innocent die, and the blood isn't just on society's hands.
We all know the history of blacks in this country, but are we trying to change it or nah? And if we are, do we not change and demand that the other side change first? Or can both sides (white AND black) be pressured to change at the same damn time?
As for my initial question: Sure gang-bangers do weep for their members, but do they weep for the collateral victims of their actions? BECAUSE THOSE EXIST TOO, let's not pretend that they don't.