Kendrick Lamar doing the SuperBowl Halftime show

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
59,736
Reputation
8,867
Daps
165,039


1/7
Drake Barber, MA ✨🤎🌈

When I say this visual quacked at the maga girls, I mean it!!! Bluesky 🦆

bafkreihibdsvup5swazvy54xpasgwzekrolosqjbs2cjzjx2g77tmjlmqa@jpeg


2/7
‪Peter Pantsless Geraci‬ ‪@pnxnotded.bsky.social‬

Sam was perfect.

3/7
‪Drake Barber, MA ✨🤎🌈‬ ‪@drakesuniverse.bsky.social‬

Yes

4/7
‪HiroshimaBlues‬ ‪@hiroshimablues.bsky.social‬

They MAD mad! 🤣😭

5/7
‪Jack 🇨🇦🐳🧬📸👾📖 (JJ)‬ ‪@jacklaliberty.bsky.social‬

i didn't watch as i'm a lions fan and didn't want to see the orange shyt stains face for a single second. i am so happy that this halftime show was what it was. and kendrick lamar has a new fan.

6/7
‪"Time to Punch Nazis" Little Cults 4 Ever‬ ‪@littlecults4ever.bsky.social‬

Yeah I think one of my relatives was Not Happy about this. They got up and left the room halfway through.

7/7
‪HiroshimaBlues‬ ‪@hiroshimablues.bsky.social‬

🤣🤣🤣

To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
 
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
245
Reputation
-54
Daps
304
Reppin
NULL

:aicmon:

This tweet is misleading because it lacks context about how viewership was measured and compares two different metrics.

Kendrick’s 133.5M viewers were counted under Nielsen’s updated 2025 system, which includes out-of-home (OOH) viewing (bars, hotels, restaurants) and streaming. In contrast, MJ’s 133.4M in 1993 was strictly U.S.-only and based on in-home TV ratings, meaning it didn’t include OOH or streaming.

Claiming Kendrick ‘surpassed’ MJ isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison—it’s just a different way of counting viewers.
 

2ATMsYouSteppinOrWhat

f*** apologies, i wanna see y’all geeked up
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
7,505
Reputation
2,083
Daps
30,362
:aicmon:

This tweet is misleading because it lacks context about how viewership was measured and compares two different metrics.

Kendrick’s 133.5M viewers were counted under Nielsen’s updated 2025 system, which includes out-of-home (OOH) viewing (bars, hotels, restaurants) and streaming. In contrast, MJ’s 133.4M in 1993 was strictly U.S.-only and based on in-home TV ratings, meaning it didn’t include OOH or streaming.

Claiming Kendrick ‘surpassed’ MJ isn’t an apples-to-apples comparison—it’s just a different way of counting viewers.

:umad:
 
Top