KD and Draymond throwing "triple double" shade

[GoddamnyamanProf]

It's the way KD said it.......


Then the way Draymond goofy ass repeats it



That gives it away that they clearly talking about Russ.

"We care about our team, not chasing stats"


Coincidentally Russell Westbrook is averaging a triple double. Yeah clear as fukking day. You idiots saying otherwise need to fukk on somewhere.

Not to mention servant's OTHER former teammate is also putting up videogame numbers and just posted the best triple double of all time. Top 2 MVP candidates

They can stand anyone else getting attention

 

[Kd35brah]

Westbrook said the SAME thing about Triple Doubles.

Coliseum don't know shyt tho

"Honestly, man, people and this triple-double thing is kind of getting on my nerves," said Westbrook, who missed 18 of 25 shots and had five turnovers against the Jazz and has 12 triple-doubles for the season. "People think if I don't get it, it's like a big thing. When I do get it, it's a thing. If y'all just let me play ... if I get it, I get it. If I don't, I don't. It is what it is. I really don't care. For the 100th time, I don't care.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

He's right in a way. The triple-double is the most arbitrary stat in basketball... where a 18-11-12 counts but a 40-18-9 doesn't. You're counting whether three different box score stats jump over an imaginary barrier that means nothing, and once you pass that barrier, getting extra don't matter at all. If Westbrook averages 27-10.0-10.0 this year, he's "historic", but if he averages 32-12-9.9 or 32-9.9-12, then he's just "close". Getting g a triple-double gives you a vague idea of a player's effort, usage, and skill, but to treat it like a real line that matters is silly.

Westbrook always get asked about his own triple doubles and he says the same thing, doesn't care about stats and just wants to win. Is he dissing Harden? Or maybe its him telling Magic Johnson to go fukk himself?.

Westbrook's triple doubles have helped his team a great deal. So, he isn't hurting his team and definitely not padding his stats. He's just doing enough to help his team win.

Gil-Scott Heroin was pointing out earlier that Westbrook chases assists early in the game and then changes his behavior once he hits 10, and he's a big Westbrook fan. And I think he's right. Westbrook's assists drop WAY off from the first half to the second... Except in games where he hasn't hit the number yet. Yet his shots are more in the second half than the first. He also makes a lot more assists when the game is out of hand, but takes more shots when it's close.

You also see the way the Thunder are giving him all the uncontested rebounds and how he hunts for the boards. I've never seen a point guard suddenly jump in boards like this, and it's ALL accounted for on the defensive side.

2008-2014: 4.9-5.7 rebounds every single season. Like clockwork.
14-15: 7.3
15-16: 7.8
16-17: 10.6

2008-2014: 1.2-2.2 offensive boards
14-15: 1.9
15-16: 1.8
16-17: 1.9

2008-2014: 2.7-4.5 defensive boards
14-15: 5.4
15-16: 6.0
16-17: 8.5


It's not like he became a better rebounder. It's not like he's getting his team more second chances. It's just that he's focused on uncontested defensive rebounds in a way he never did the first six years of his career.

 

[Raw Lyrics]

He's right in a way. The triple-double is the most arbitrary stat in basketball... where a 18-11-12 counts but a 40-18-9 doesn't. You're counting whether three different box score stats jump over an imaginary barrier that means nothing, and once you pass that barrier, getting extra don't matter at all. If Westbrook averages 27-10.0-10.0 this year, he's "historic", but if he averages 32-12-9.9 or 32-9.9-12, then he's just "close". Getting g a triple-double gives you a vague idea of a player's effort, usage, and skill, but to treat it like a real line that matters is silly.

.

Agreed, Jordan's 32ppg, 8 assists and 8 rebounds per game hardly ever gets talked about. To me, it's one of the most spectacular seasons in NBA history.

 

[Bay Area]

We have multiple rings.. we'll be fine regardless.. this winning shyt ain't new for us

All that winning and you still looking salty

Like I said hopefully your squad gets out the 2nd round so you have a chance to defeat your most hated team of all time

 

[livindajetlife]

All that winning and you still looking salty

Like I said hopefully your squad gets out the 2nd round so you have a chance to defeat your most hated team of all time

win a couple more rings then I'll take you serious

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

Yeah but a reporter would say that I answered 2 as a way of saying the teacher was full of shyt.

U gone neg me the next day

 

[Bilz]

U gone neg me the next day

are you talking about?

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

are you talking about?

Oh wait it was @Miami316 headass



Y'all basically the same poster to me,

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

@Miami316

Ok stop now

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

@Miami316

Ok stop now

can't stop. Won't stop

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

can't stop. Won't stop

3 negs in a row, that's just negligent

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

3 negs in a row, that's just negligent

I see what you did there

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

He's right in a way. The triple-double is the most arbitrary stat in basketball... where a 18-11-12 counts but a 40-18-9 doesn't. You're counting whether three different box score stats jump over an imaginary barrier that means nothing, and once you pass that barrier, getting extra don't matter at all. If Westbrook averages 27-10.0-10.0 this year, he's "historic", but if he averages 32-12-9.9 or 32-9.9-12, then he's just "close". Getting g a triple-double gives you a vague idea of a player's effort, usage, and skill, but to treat it like a real line that matters is silly.






Gil-Scott Heroin was pointing out earlier that Westbrook chases assists early in the game and then changes his behavior once he hits 10, and he's a big Westbrook fan. And I think he's right. Westbrook's assists drop WAY off from the first half to the second... Except in games where he hasn't hit the number yet. Yet his shots are more in the second half than the first. He also makes a lot more assists when the game is out of hand, but takes more shots when it's close.

You also see the way the Thunder are giving him all the uncontested rebounds and how he hunts for the boards. I've never seen a point guard suddenly jump in boards like this, and it's ALL accounted for on the defensive side.

2008-2014: 4.9-5.7 rebounds every single season. Like clockwork.
14-15: 7.3
15-16: 7.8
16-17: 10.6

2008-2014: 1.2-2.2 offensive boards
14-15: 1.9
15-16: 1.8
16-17: 1.9

2008-2014: 2.7-4.5 defensive boards
14-15: 5.4
15-16: 6.0
16-17: 8.5


It's not like he became a better rebounder. It's not like he's getting his team more second chances. It's just that he's focused on uncontested defensive rebounds in a way he never did the first six years of his career.

Is there a point to this?

 

[Bilz]

Oh wait it was @Miami316 headass



Y'all basically the same poster to me,

I'll just start making Jew jokes to you then